51
AMD says 'there is a ton of interest' in FSR 4 and that it is 'working very hard to make sure the next blockbusters that come out are enabled with FSR 4 technology' (www.pcgamer.com)
submitted 1 week ago by alessandro@lemmy.ca to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca
18 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Tywele@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 week ago

Good. FSR is finally able to compete with DLSS.

[-] moody@lemmings.world 1 points 1 week ago

Is it? I haven't used an Nvidia GPU since the GTX series, but my understanding was that DLSS was very effective. Meanwhile, the artifacting on FSR bothers the crap out of me.

[-] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yes. FSR4 is the first version that uses dedicated hardware to do it like DLSS. Consensus seems to be that's it's on the same level as DLSS 3 (CDN model) but is heavier to run, which is pretty great for a first attempt.

[-] moody@lemmings.world 1 points 1 week ago

I see, it's unfortunate that it requires dedicated hardware, but I guess it makes sense when the main competitor already has that.

this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2025
51 points (100.0% liked)

PC Gaming

10650 readers
507 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
EXiLExJD@lemmy.ca
UncleBadTouch@lemmy.ca
KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com