479
submitted 1 month ago by ooli2@lemm.ee to c/buyeuropean@feddit.uk
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 1 month ago

Last year I learned from independent consumer product testing agencies that at least here in germany the best dental care is provided using the most basic and cheap toothpaste from discounter chains, so now I use those. So much cheaper, so much more toothpaste in the tube and actually doesn't secretly fuck your teeth up.

[-] LongestPath@feddit.org 9 points 1 month ago

Can you elaborate more please? Or give us a link to the report.

[-] baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 month ago

https://www.test.de/Zahnpasta-im-Test-4607097-0/ german and 5โ‚ฌ for the data, but newspapers often share snippets of it for free

[-] LongestPath@feddit.org 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Thanks for the the link, I will look into it. However, personally, I would not trust Stiftung Warentest results that much. For few other products, I looked deep into how they score them (via their videos and articles and then other resources), and imo, their score didn't seem to reflect a lab-test result, but rather "how we feel about it" result (I can elaborate more if you are interested). Here, from first look, it is much better than its other tests, however, having 10% of score for packaging (it got higher from 5%) is annoying to me. For example, it says "Five experts test how well the packs open and shut": I mean... It is good know, but I rather would have a toothpaste that is better for my teeth and opens badly compared to a toothpaste that is terrible but opens nicely!

[-] jwt@programming.dev 4 points 1 month ago

and actually doesn't secretly fuck your teeth up.

Well that's a ominous insinuation without proper sourcing.

[-] baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 month ago

I just meant some big name brand toothpastes being very abrasive to (imo) a point of detriment

[-] jwt@programming.dev 7 points 1 month ago

That's not an opinion, it either is or isn't detrimental.

[-] baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago

well you might just slowly brush away your enamel

[-] jwt@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago

You 'might' not be able to provide sources for that insinuation.

[-] Chocobofangirl@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

https://lemmy.world/post/27216049/15931778 here's someone linking the PDF that explains what they mean. pertinent screenshots:

this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2025
479 points (100.0% liked)

Buy European

5549 readers
459 users here now

Overview:

The community to discuss buying European goods and services.


Matrix Chat


Rules:

  • Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. No direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments.

  • Do not use this community to promote Nationalism/Euronationalism. This community is for discussing European products/services and news related to that. For other topics the following might be of interest:

  • Include a disclaimer at the bottom of the post if you're affiliated with the recommendation.

  • No russian suggestions.

Feddit.uk's instance rules apply:

  • No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia
  • No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies
  • No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users
  • Do not share intentionally false or misleading information
  • Do not spam or abuse network features.
  • Alt accounts are permitted, but all accounts must list each other in their bios.

Benefits of Buying Local:

local investment, job creation, innovation, increased competition, more redundancy.

European Instances

Lemmy:

Matrix:


Related Communities:

Buy Local:

Continents:

European:

Buying and Selling:

Boycott:

Countries:

Companies:

Stop Publisher Kill Switch in Games Practice:


Banner credits: BYTEAlliance


founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS