940

We are also changing how remote playback works for streaming personal media (that is, playback when not on the same local network as the server). The reality is that we need more resources to continue putting forth the best personal media experience, and as a result, we will no longer offer remote playback as a free feature. This—alongside the new Plex Pass pricing—will help provide those resources. This change will apply to the future release of our new Plex experience for mobile and other platforms.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] rekabis@programming.dev 20 points 18 hours ago

I don’t like it, but it’s a pragmatic decision.

Hosting for a simple website can be as little as a few bucks a month. That’s easy for any project to absorb, even if they are open-source with no one pulling a paycheque.

Streaming requires high-performance, high-bandwidth machines that cost anywhere from several dozen dollars to several hundred dollars a month. You build a resilient high-availability network, and you could easily be looking at several tens of thousands of dollars a month.

That isn’t easy to absorb, even for a for-profit company with clearly-defined revenue streams.

Some people want everything for free, but free doesn’t pay the bills.

Full disclosure: I don’t use the streaming feature. I prefer to grab actual copies to drop onto my NAS. I also don’t share to friends and family, as I am the only one I know of who uses Plex.

[-] Markaos@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

The thing that's going to be locked behind the subscription is your ability to watch those files on your NAS through Plex when you're not in the same network as the Plex server. That's streaming.

If you only use Plex while at home, you will indeed be unaffected

[-] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 28 points 17 hours ago

Streaming requires high-performance, high-bandwidth machines that cost anywhere from several dozen dollars to several hundred dollars a month. You build a resilient high-availability network, and you could easily be looking at several tens of thousands of dollars a month.

Are you under the impression that Plex uploads the movie files to their servers and then transcodes them there, or something?

And the hard work happens on your own hardware. All Plex's servers are doing is acting as a signaling server, but no media or routed through Plex's servers.

[-] huskypenguin@sh.itjust.works 7 points 16 hours ago

Plex actually does have streaming services. The ones we've never asked for. And live tv.

[-] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

But the blog post from Plex was specifically talking about charging for remotely accessing your own files. So your point is irrelevant to the discussion.

[-] huskypenguin@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 hours ago

How is it irrelevant? Plex offers a bunch of services that cost them money that we don't use, so they jacked up prices for streaming our own data.

[-] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

It's irrelevant because even Plex themselves made no mention of their in-house streaming stuff. The discussion is about being charged to view your videos, hosted on your own self-hosted server, viewed on your own device.

[-] huskypenguin@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago

I disagree. Sometimes you need to look at the situation as a whole in order to understand the motivation.

[-] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Ok, so you're implying people were using their videos for free instead of paying for the streaming services. Then Plex wanted more money so they've started to charge people for using their own stuff.

That's fine, and frankly I agree with that.

But your initial reply to me is still irrelevant to the discussion.

[-] kogasa@programming.dev 5 points 16 hours ago

It depends on if you use the "relay" feature. If your server is accessible from the outside it shouldn't be using this though.

[-] jeanofthedead@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 hours ago

First thing I disable.

[-] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 23 points 16 hours ago

All those resources and costs are borne by the person hosting the video, NOT Plex.

[-] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 14 hours ago

they need none of that stuff. It's your own pc that handles the heavy stuff. From their end, the only point is to allow you to stream videos from behind one or more NATs

[-] PoorlySketchedIdiot@feddit.nl 4 points 13 hours ago

That high performance, high bandwidth streaming machine is in my house, not Plex's, though. I already pay for the maintenence, power and the bandwidth of that machine, not Plex.

this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
940 points (100.0% liked)

Selfhosted

44652 readers
1921 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS