473
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
473 points (100.0% liked)
Palestine
1237 readers
642 users here now
A community to discuss everything Palestine.
Rules:
-
Posts can be in Arabic or English.
-
Please add a flair in the title of every post. Example: “[News] Israel annexes the West Bank ”, “[Culture] Musakhan is the nicest food in the world!”, “[Question] How many Palestinians live in Jordan?”
List of flairs: [News] [Culture] [Discussion] [Question] [Request] [Guide]
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
It's there but media and the government are not covering it.
I've seen plenty of articles on both the Guardian as well as the Dutch state broadcaster. Both have liveblogs with frequent updates.
Those 2 will surely mention Israhell has the right to defend itself.
They both cited Israel's given reason for the attack, the response from Hamas, the critique and condemnation from the UN, human rights organizations and several world leaders, as well as an expert opinion explaining that this could mean the end of the ceasefire.
Both were factual and neutral in their reporting.
Any mention of this being going on since the nakba of 1947?
There was no war in israel before oct 7.
Like there was no war in ukraine before 2022.
Who needs in-depth background when it's inconvenient?
Did they mention that Israel is blatantly lying about its reason?
Did they mention that Israel has repeatedly violated the ceasefire?
Did they identify that Israel is committing genocide?
Did they avoid calling the government of Gaza "a terrorist organisation"
Did they avoid calling IDF soldiers taken as prisoners of war "hostages"?
Here's the Guardian article on the condemnation of the attacks: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/mar/18/un-human-rights-chief-voices-horror-at-israel-new-gaza-strikes
It does include that Israel is accused of genocide by multiple parties and explicitly includes Turkey's response, which also directly accuses Israel of genocide. The French response calls out the Israeli justification, saying there's no identifiable military objective.
They do name Hamas, but not as a terrorist organization.
Here's a slightly more recent article that focuses on Israel's justification and Netanyahu's comments: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/mar/18/israel-gaza-strikes-deaths-latest-update
It contains the justification that Israel provided, but also additional context (e.g. the actual terms of the ceasefire) that show a stark contrast between the ceasefire agreement and what Israel is doing now. The article also highlights the human suffering this has caused. It also concludes by showing the disproportionate death toll that Israel has inflicted on Gaza.
Here's an opinion article published today from one of the main columnists that is very explicit about the genocide in Gaza: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/mar/19/imagine-silent-terrible-evil-committed-gaza-inaction-censorship
So maybe let's not attack media outlets that do actually show what is going on and that are willing to call it what it is?
I won't bother with the Dutch state broadcaster because I doubt you speak the language, but with them it's mostly the same story, though they don't have opinion articles and the liveblog posts are a bit more concise. But they too have reported on ceasefire violations by Israel and the ICC case for genocide against Israel, and they often have expert opinions that also call out the disproportionate violence from the Israeli side.
thanks hasbara person.
https://www.declassifieduk.org/battle-for-the-truth-pro-israel-bias-inside-uk-newsrooms-revealed/
@index I'm not seeing it on social media either.
Some small scale actions but nothing like those in south korea or other places
On the fediverse there is
That is only bcs it is still small and has no impact.
The socmed that matters has long been put under control by the regime.
Or banned like TikTok if they can't.