Nato 'might have to get involved' in US takeover of Greenland, says Trump – video (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 1 month ago by humanspiral@lemmy.ca to c/endlesswar@lemmy.ca

3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The only reason US needs to control Greenland instead of a NATO ally is to threaten Europe.

Greenland is far away from Russia. BS that Russia and China have a presence in Arctic is that they are cooperating on projects in Russian waters. Any use of Greenland waters for shipping will be to deliver to eastern North America from China, and so inherently welcome.

There will be zero resource development projects in Canada or Greenland by countries that have enemy status with NATO, because of extreme expense of shipping resources back to Russia, and extreme risk of sabotage of projects.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] skozzii@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

Where are all those Trump supporters claiming he is going to end all wars and violence globally. Seems to be doing the opposite now? New countries looking for nukes, military spending globally is going to be at record levels.

this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025

17 points (100.0% liked)

Endless War

107 readers

1 users here now

Community critical of US Empire's thirst for endless war, its military and oil oligarchies and colonization of allies.

founded 5 months ago

MODERATORS

humanspiral@lemmy.ca