1711
Dunning-Kruger (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] EnthusiasticNature94 32 points 4 months ago

I agree with Dr. Jey McCreight on the science.

But for determining truth, both sides are wrong here.

Dunning-Kruger is bad, but so is credentialism and appeal to authority.

Many people with PhD's have had Dunning-Kruger. Someone else mentioned Ben Carson being great at neurosurgery, but not politics.

A PhD doesn't make you infallible.

I am saying this as someone who is taking graduate-level courses and will be pursuing my PhD. When I'm correct, it's not because my future PhD causes reality to magically conform to my opinions - it's because I rigorously looked at the evidence, logic, and formed my own conclusion that better aligns with reality.

[-] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works 23 points 4 months ago

You can even be incorrect on a subject you have expertise in.

[-] bountygiver@lemmy.ml 12 points 4 months ago

that's why we have peer reviews for new findings by experts.

[-] EnthusiasticNature94 6 points 4 months ago

Exactly, imagine if we threw away the entire peer review process and made it about, "Well I have a PhD! Checkmate."

We'd descend into a dark age for science.

[-] EnthusiasticNature94 10 points 4 months ago

Experts often disagree.

If it were that easy, everything would be solved. We wouldn't need so much research or so many universities.

[-] Lumbardo@reddthat.com 2 points 4 months ago

If one hasn't fallen victim to Dunning-Kruger, then they have not advanced their knowledge in any meaningful capacity.

[-] EnthusiasticNature94 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I agree, but respectfully, I'm not sure what this has to do with my comment. 😭

[-] Lumbardo@reddthat.com 1 points 4 months ago

Just a branch off thought I had when you said many people with PhDs have had Dunning-Kruger. In general, I think the way the term is used (especially online) is used incorrectly.

Everybody should experience Dunning-Kruger, it's part of the process of learning something. People who use it as an insult should be calling their accusee arrogant instead.

[-] EnthusiasticNature94 1 points 4 months ago

Ah, got it. Thank you for explaining. 😌

[-] freely1333@reddthat.com 1 points 4 months ago

Listing Ben Carson as “not great at politics” when he was a polling national candidate for the highest office in the world is a wee bit of wild work. That’s like saying Kevin Durant is not great at basketball.

[-] EnthusiasticNature94 1 points 4 months ago

Sure, but that's another discussion and is irrelevant to my point.

You should take it to the commentor who originally said that.

this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
1711 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

16046 readers
646 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS