677

cross-posted from: https://infosec.pub/post/24994013

CJR study shows AI search services misinform users and ignore publisher exclusion requests.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 31 points 1 day ago

While I do think that it's simply bad at generating answers because that is all that's going on, generating the most likely next word that works a lot of the time but then can fail spectacularly...

What if we've created AI but by training it with internet content, we're simply being trolled by the ultimate troll combination ever.

[-] seaQueue@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

This is what happens when you train your magical AI on a decade+ of internet shitposting

[-] T156@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They didn't learn from all the previous times someone tried to train a bot on the internet.

[-] pogmommy@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's almost poetic how Tay.ai, Microsoft's earlier shitty ai, was also poisoned by internet trolling and became a Nazi on twitter nearly a decade ago

this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2025
677 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

66465 readers
4164 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS