108

It was that speech where a female from CA I think told him "see you in court" around 22nd Feb, and this was regarding trans' rights I believe.

I watched some of it live. He talked about lots of things and said he wants to ban all voting booths and have paper ballots and that (in his typical self) "there won't be cheating, they have advanced technology, really advanced stuff. It's called... "watermark". It's really great".

Combined with the accusations that there were indeed cheating by paper ballots for some states, it's kinda the smoking gun that would mean he perhaps shouldn't be president?

Why is no one here talking about this? Why is no one outraged?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Tuuktuuk@sopuli.xyz 24 points 4 months ago

Paper ballots make cheating much more difficult than electronic ones do. I'm not sure why Trump demands paper ballots, but in my opinion they are the only sensible option.

Where I live, all elections are always strictly 100 % paper ballots, and it is isn't really a problem. Yeah, you need people to count them, but those people are reasonably easy to find. And the ballot counting scales easily from a few hundred votes to several hundred millions of votes.

[-] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

Sounds great till you live somewhere like Texas where they have closed down large swaths of places to vote and you have to drive and/or wait hours outside in the hot sun. And they don't allow organizations to pass out bottled water.

[-] zonnewin@feddit.nl 10 points 4 months ago

That just means they need to open more places to vote. One shouldn't have to go far or wait more than a few minutes in order to vote. That the US allows these scandalous practices is beyond belief.

[-] Bunbury@feddit.nl 7 points 4 months ago

Problem is that lack of places to vote isn’t a bug. It’s a feature. It means people who don’t have access to transport or who have do work during the day have a more difficult time voting. Not everyone has the time to drive somewhere and then stand in line for hours. Republicans have used this as one of their techniques to discourage certain groups of people from voting at all.

[-] zonnewin@feddit.nl 2 points 4 months ago

And I don't understand why anyone is allowing them to do this. It's clearly anti-democratic abuse.

[-] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

That just means they need to open more places to vote.

Better chance of winning the lottery a few times.

One shouldn't have to go far or wait more than a few minutes in order to vote.

In a fair and just system you would be correct. Not in America.

That the US allows these scandalous practices is beyond belief.

Did you see the piece of shit half of US voters thought "that'll do"? We have nearly half a billion guns but not enough brain cells to best an ameoba in a kindergarten trivia contest.

[-] zonnewin@feddit.nl 1 points 4 months ago

You are right, of course. But that is deeply concerning.

[-] Tuuktuuk@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 months ago

I don't think it matters whether after those hours of travelling and queuing you need to press buttons on a touch screen or scribble two or three numbers on a piece of paper.

Neither case makes the drive any shorter.

this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
108 points (100.0% liked)

World News

48660 readers
1363 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS