2
The Ukraine War’s Finale is Upsetting—but Trump Isn’t to Blame
(www.theamericanconservative.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2025
2 points (100.0% liked)
Endless War
101 readers
5 users here now
Community critical of US Empire's thirst for endless war, its military and oil oligarchies and colonization of allies.
founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
There were no provocations. After the Soviet Union broke up there was a time that Russia considered joining NATO. A country not wanting to be invaded is not a provocation.
The article is non stop lies like this, "NATO had broken its promise not to expand eastward after the Cold War,"
To be a lie, NATO would have never made the promise to Gorbachev. Every provocation listed is verifiably true.
NATO never made the promise and Gorbachev never even asked.
https://www.chathamhouse.org/2021/05/myths-and-misconceptions-debate-russia/myth-03-russia-was-promised-nato-would-not-enlarge
Hillarious
The verbal promises and announcements were lies, and NATO expansion after the cold war should be understood as "Love for Russia from a purely defensive alliance" that is always committed to truth and will of the people.
Demonic warmongering forever for you trolls.
Which part of "there were no promises" do you not understand?
How was Poland joining NATO demonic warmongering? Russia could even join NATO if she wanted. But Russia would have to give up war and Russia won't do that.
lol this is like saying "every reason I bet my wife is verifiably true". Just because a thing happened doesn't mean it's actually a reason to beat your wife. Just like the "verifiably true" provocations aren't actually provocations for the slaughter of Ukrainians.
Losers provoking the war are responsible for the slaughter of Ukrainians, as intended. Wars result in deaths.