168
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/firefox@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FarraigePlaisteach@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago

I was initially against DRM support, but in hindsight I believe FF would have quickly slipped into irrelevance without it.

[-] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 20 points 1 month ago

Yeah, with standards you have to pick your battles like that. It would have been perceived badly, and anything else Firefox would have wanted to do would have been shot down with that used as the example. A good stake in the ground they made was with manifest v3 and not arbitrarily trying to stop ad blockers, and they had the power to do that, granted less of a standard.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago

Exactly. DRM is up to the user, whereas Manifest v3... isn't.

this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2025
168 points (100.0% liked)

Firefox

19320 readers
246 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS