168
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/firefox@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FarraigePlaisteach@lemmy.world 31 points 5 months ago

I was initially against DRM support, but in hindsight I believe FF would have quickly slipped into irrelevance without it.

[-] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 20 points 5 months ago

Yeah, with standards you have to pick your battles like that. It would have been perceived badly, and anything else Firefox would have wanted to do would have been shot down with that used as the example. A good stake in the ground they made was with manifest v3 and not arbitrarily trying to stop ad blockers, and they had the power to do that, granted less of a standard.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 10 points 5 months ago

Exactly. DRM is up to the user, whereas Manifest v3... isn't.

this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2025
168 points (100.0% liked)

Firefox

20595 readers
36 users here now

/c/firefox

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox.


Rules

1. Adhere to the instance rules

2. Be kind to one another

3. Communicate in a civil manner


Reporting

If you would like to bring an issue to the moderators attention, please use the "Create Report" feature on the offending comment or post and it will be reviewed as time allows.


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS