346
submitted 3 months ago by Sunshine@lemmy.ca to c/transgender
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] parmesan@lemmy.world 36 points 3 months ago

When she finally exited the stall, she said she lifted her shirt to prove she was not a man, expecting the ordeal to end. Instead, she said one deputy continued to question her appearance, insisting she “looked like a man.”

The police are equally if not more deserving of blame for continually harassing this woman even after forcing her to expose herself to them.

[-] 0101100101@programming.dev 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

When she finally exited the stall, she said she lifted her shirt to prove she was not a man, expecting the ordeal to end.

The police are equally if not more deserving of blame for continually harassing this woman even after forcing her to expose herself to them.

From the way it's written, she did it voluntarily expecting it to then end. It does not state the police officers asked / required her to do so. If you invite a bunch of idiots in, they're going to behave like idiots. The impetus was the Walmart employee

[-] parmesan@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago

From the way it's written, she did it voluntarily expecting it to then end.

This doesn't change the fact they cornered her in a women's bathroom and made her feel like she needed to expose herself to them in order to stay safe. We have no way of knowing what they might have done to her if she hadn't.

[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

The impetus was the Walmart employee

no, the impetus was conservative rhetoric. conservatives made this whole fucking bullshit issue out of nothing, it's neither biologically nor sociologically consistent and simply weaponized hate turned into conservative legislation to again shit on anyone who is not cis/het/white.

never forget, walmart didn't invent this bullshi, cops didn't even invent this bullshit, conservatives invented this bullshit.

[-] 0101100101@programming.dev 1 points 3 months ago

I'm not American but you're hiding from a very ugly truth. The conservatives didn't invent it. There was clearly a sizeable group of the population who felt this way but were previously oppressed from their opinions. What you're seeing is, I guess, "free speech"? You may not like it, but that's the price of "free speech".

[-] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 months ago

This is a fundamental misunderstanding of the first amendment.

"Free speech" in the context of the US Constitution means that one is free to criticize the government without fear of retaliation (which is currently being dismantled). "Free speech" does not mean that one gets to say anything they want without consequence.

this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2025
346 points (100.0% liked)

Transgender

753 readers
28 users here now

Overview:

The Lemmy place to discuss the news and experiences of transgender people.


Rules:

  1. Keep discussions civil.

  2. Arguments against transgender rights will be removed.

  3. No bigotry is allowed - including transphobia, homophobia, speciesism, racism, sexism, classism, ableism, castism, or xenophobia.

Shinigami Eyes:

Extension for Quickly Spotting Transphobes Online.

Shinigami Eyes

spoiler iphone: unofficial workaround to use extension Install the Orion browser then add the extension. :::

Related:!lgbtq_plus@lemmy.blahaj.zone

!intersex@lemmy.blahaj.zone


founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS