625
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 146 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

We are going to be writing every day in support and defense of two pillars: personal liberties and free markets.

Democracy dies in the free market.

[-] tburkhol@lemmy.world 58 points 2 days ago

Who wants democracy, when we can have an anarcho-capitalist libertarian utopia?

[-] TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee 33 points 2 days ago

anarcho-capitalist libertarian utopia?

I hate that edgelord libertarians are trying to rebrand themselves as "anarcho-capatalist". Anarchy and capitalism are antithetical to one another. It doesn't have anything to do with anarchy if you aren't evaluating hierarchy, and capitalism is literally one of the most hierarchical organizational structures possible.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 14 points 2 days ago

Fun fact: Conservatism was literally invented by a monarchist in the aftermath of the French revolution trying to find a way for an aristocracy to exist within democracy.

I would like to read more about this shitstain, and why I should throw axes at a printed out image of his face. Name and source?

[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

Except England wasn't a democracy at the time, it was a heavily rigged parliamentary system with a limited franchise, and it could be overridden by the Lords. But yeah, conservatism represented the interests of the aristocrats, in opposition to Englightenment notions like equality, accountability, rule of law and meritocracy.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 2 points 2 days ago

I at least was talking about Burke, whose most influential work was talking about the French revolution, not the English revolution(s). That one was, at least in the start, a proper democracy.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago

edgelord libertarians are trying to rebrand themselves as "anarcho-capatalist

Actually, American style " libertarianism" IS anarcho-capitalism. They've just been trying to keep that a secret until recently.

Anarchy and capitalism are antithetical to one another.

Yes, and no. Anarcho-capitalism is anarchic in the colloquial "no rules, no order" sense, whereas political anarchy very much isn't.

The stupidity of the term is what makes it apt, though: the people politically illiterate enough to think that a total lack of regulations and worker's rights would lead to anything resembling freedom also think that the colloquial definition of anarchy is the politically accurate one.

[-] Sekoia 5 points 2 days ago

It's anarchy for the hierarchies, not for the components of the hierarchies

[-] Tja@programming.dev 6 points 2 days ago

People voted for the leopards, you can't say it's not democracy.

[-] metaldream@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

A real democracy wouldn't allow a fascist to even run for office. Advocating for fascism and authoritarianism in a republic isn't a valid political stance. It's sedition.

[-] Tja@programming.dev 2 points 2 days ago

Well, if over 50% of votes agree, is it sedition? The American people wanted the treasonous, corrupt, criminal, draft dodger sexual predator as president. We might not like it, but it's what the majority wanted.

[-] metaldream@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 days ago

*Plurality and it's still sedition on the part of the leaders. If you advocate for authoritarianism in a republic then you are inherently advocating for overthrowing the republic. You are advocating for some people to have rights, while others don't.

It doesn't matter if a majority of voters want that, they don't have the right to strip the minority of their right to representation.

All authoritarian ideologies are inherently incompatible with the concept of natural rights

[-] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 2 days ago

Those who don't vote make an explicit choice, so it is a majority.

And the fascist, dictatorial intentions were known from the beginning so kind of hard to argue with the result.

People voted to convert the republic to an empire.

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 days ago

In a more democratic system there wouldn’t be president Trump because there would be no presidents. So I disagree with the premise.

The presidency is fundamentally undemocratic, regardless of the quasi-performative democratic ritual by which he is selected.

[-] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one 6 points 2 days ago

At least guns and ammo will be plentiful because the market will soon demand more.

[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago

Ammoseek is pretty good for ammo. Just be careful around the low rated vendors

[-] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Thank you. What about good gun deals?

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago

"free" "market"

[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago

There is no such thing as a free market.

this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2025
625 points (100.0% liked)

News

25415 readers
5394 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS