120
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by Maven@lemmy.zip to c/fediverselore@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FirstMajesticComet 36 points 1 day ago

Already said it in !main@lemmy.blahaj.zone but I'll say it again so others can see it here.

It seems drag was banned from the site for sharing people's DMs, though I'm sure that's not the whole story, drag has a history of being banned for way more than just the thing on the label. Looking at the comments on drag's home instance where it hasn't been removed, it seems drag was sharing those DMs in attempt to libel Ada for not taking the action drag wanted. That's on top of the fact that she did not give drag permission to share them. It's an asshole move for sure, and I have to say if I were in Ada's shoes I'd do the same.

[-] princessnorah 23 points 1 day ago

Ada was also already wary of drag after the respecting pronouns rule announcement, because a number of blahaj users rightfully pointed out drag is still likely a troll. Fluff around and find out basically.

[-] FirstMajesticComet 18 points 1 day ago

It ultimately isn't surprising. Drag has been very sus from the beginning, drag exhibited a lot of behaviors that made me leery. Though at the time I didn't say anything since it was only a hunch and most people were just voicing transphobic complaints about pronouns.

[-] P4ulin_Kbana@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 15 hours ago

What made drag feel suspicious?

[-] exploitedamerican@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago

I believe transparency is desirable and the single party consent rule in regards to private conversations should be the primary accepted doctrine here outside of any communique that is sexual/private and includes nudes and or personal data and could constitute doxxing.

[-] FirstMajesticComet 13 points 1 day ago

That's your opinion, but many people do not agree with you. I myself would be pissed if you shared our DM convo without asking me first, or even letting me know you were going to. I can see why Ada would and why she did what she did, it's disrespectful and adversarial.

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Okay? Sure! Be pissed off when someone you trust violates your trust. That's not what happened here. Strangers on the Internet do not owe you anything. Even if you send them a DM.

[-] Sop 1 points 1 day ago

Interesting that you say that

[-] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 3 points 23 hours ago

Single party consent, as I myself put my foot in yesterday, is by far not the norm.

this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2025
120 points (100.0% liked)

FediLore + Fedidrama

2580 readers
141 users here now

Rules

  1. Any drama must be posted as an observer, you cannot post drama that you are involved with.
  2. When posting screenshots of drama, you must obscure the identity of all the participants.
  3. The poster must have a credible post and comment history before submitting a piece of history. This is to avoid sock-puppetry and witch hunts.

The usual instance-wide rules also apply.


Chronicle the life and tale of the fediverse (+ matrix)

Largely a sublemmy about capturing drama, from fediverse spanning drama to just lemmy drama.

Includes lore like how a instance got it's name, how an instance got defederated, how an admin got doxxed, fedihistory etc

(New) This sub's intentions is to an archive/newspaper, as in preferably don't get into fights with each other or the ppl featured in the drama

Tags: fediverse news, lemmy news, lemmyverse

Partners:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS