965
submitted 3 days ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

Summary

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy accused Donald Trump of living in a "Russian-made disinformation space" due to his administration's talks with Kremlin officials.

He urged Trump's team to be "more truthful" after Trump blamed Kyiv for the war and downplayed U.S. aid contributions.

Zelenskyy’s remarks came as U.S. envoy Keith Kellogg visited Kyiv amid shifting U.S. policy on Russia. Meanwhile, European leaders, feeling sidelined by U.S.-Russia talks, held emergency meetings.

Zelenskyy canceled a Saudi Arabia trip in protest.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] psmgx@lemmy.world 113 points 3 days ago

America is living in a disinformation space. There is a reason Musk bought Twitter, and it's not because he thought he could make it better for users.

See also: hyperreality

[-] MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Also the reason why Saudis funded it. They want a piece of the post truth pie. But why did Elon even bother with the Saudi money? Is it as simple as wanting to keep the high score?

He paid $44 billion for twitter (of his and others' money) but the presidency of the richest country on earth only cost $250 million? It doesn't add up at all.

[-] SGforce@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago

He doesn't have money. He has assets. That means he need's to take out a loan against his assets. And who would have done such a thing for a money pit that was twitter?

[-] MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago

I suspect it was planned out. He "jokingly" says he wanted to buy twitter. Courts say it was a legitimate offer and he has to go through with it. He protested for a moment then says oh well, ya got me. Commence purges that likely had to do with political beliefs, then here we are, buying the president of the USA for 1/176th the price of twitter. I'm just rambling here but where's the missing piece? Or is it just that cut and dry?

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

Same thought came to mind two days ago. In retrospect, that Twitter purchase appears so excellent as to make the attempted backtracking look contrived and intentional.

But there are other possible explanations. Maybe he jumped the gun before his planning partners had agreed to.

And I'm reminded there doesn't need to be any conspiracy here because I can't think of what would have been different if the purchase were announced as a one intended to influence politics.

[-] Digestive_Biscuit@feddit.uk 2 points 2 days ago

Wasn't he pushing the angle that Twitter falsely stated the user base because of the high numbers of bots and therefore falsely stated the business value? I think he was trying to push the sale value down. I could easily be wrong, I didnt follow it closely.

[-] lil0ps@lemmings.world 1 points 2 days ago

Rambling a bit

[-] lil0ps@lemmings.world 1 points 2 days ago

Ppl don’t get it. They yell ‘give all his money to us’ but then the stock market crashes when billions of ‘dollars’ are pulled out of the system. I think he was reported to have sold stocks pre-twitter sales but he didn’t have the cash up front. He probably takes no salary and just pulls from company profits into an estate fund like it’s his bank account so most of his wealth is in his companies. Twitter has turned into the red pill space we would expect of America and not the Saudis prolly because Saudis put in 1/44th of the money it took to buy Twitter. There are millions of other multi millionaires, investment groups, etc he could much more money from.

this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2025
965 points (100.0% liked)

World News

41185 readers
3046 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS