118
submitted 2 weeks ago by NightOwl@lemmy.ca to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Really? How well did throwing away nukes go for Ukraine?

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 21 points 2 weeks ago

Irrelevant. This is about multilateral nuclear arms reduction, not unilateral nuclear disarmament.

[-] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

And every step closer, is a step closer to death. Nuclear weapons are a tigers tail. When we let go, we all die.

[-] doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

More like a paper tiger, you fuckin psycho

[-] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Japan survived two nukes and became one of the largest financial forces in the world. So how many could Russia survive? 10? 50? Maybe Putin like those odds. Maybe Iran decides it's worth it to clear out Israel. If there's only a few nukes involved, the crazy fucks start thinking they can win a nuclear war, or at least survive it well enough to be worth it.

[-] Garibaldee@lemm.ee 10 points 2 weeks ago

Having less nukes is not the same as disarmament it's not even comparable. They dropped two nukes and did that much destruction in Japan, 2, and those were 1940s nukes, even with this change the US would still have thousands of nukes.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-many-nuclear-weapons-exist-and-who-has-them/

the United States admits to having 5,550

Ukraine went to 0 nukes, the US has 5000+ nukes, how would that even be comparable if the US let's say went down to 1000 nukes. That's still 1000 nukes more than 0.

[-] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Every step closer to disarmament bring us closer to nuclear war. Every nuke disarmed makes us one step closer to Putin or Xi thinking they can win a nuclear war.

[-] superkret@feddit.org 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

By that logic, we must build 100x more nukes than we currently have, and if anyone suggests that 10x more is enough, they're a Russian puppet.

Or would you care to explain why the current number of nukes is the perfect amount, as opposed to, say, 1000 less? Did you even know how many nukes the US has when you wrote your comment?

[-] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

The actual number is irrelevant, the change in number does Khamenei doesn't know how many nukes Israel or the US actual have. He'll make decisions based on what he does know. And a draw down tells him he can get away with more attacks.

this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2025
118 points (100.0% liked)

World News

33742 readers
285 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS