759

Summary

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, in a private meeting inadvertently broadcast via a hot mic, warned that Donald Trump is seriously considering annexing Canada to secure its critical mineral resources.

Speaking to business and labor leaders, Trudeau claimed Trump’s administration is keenly aware of Canada’s resource wealth and sees annexation as a means to control it.

The comments, cut off after staff realized they were audible, underscore growing economic and political tensions.

He also stressed the need to diversify trade, noting, “Geography means we’re always going to both benefit and be challenged by trade with the United States.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

I cannot stress enough how bad of an idea it would be to allow nuclear proliferation at this point

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago
[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Nuclear proliferation is always bad. I don't give a damn about the second cold war.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

No one said it was good. I said you're too late. The proliferation is happening regardless.

I used to be like you, but then I learned to stop worrying and love the bomb

[-] prole 1 points 16 hours ago

Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the war room!

[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 8 points 1 day ago

If i were Taiwan or Iran or Ukraine it would be my top priority.

[-] Takapapatapaka@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I cannot agree with you more, and i'm very sad to see so much upvotes in favor of nuclear intensification Bombs do not protect from bombs, guns do not protect from guns

[-] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That's a nice and noble idealism, but what evidence do you have for it? Ukraine gave up its nuclear weapons, and look how that turned out for them. There is a reason Zelensky has been pushing so hard for NATO membership. It's easy to idealistically reject nuclear weapons when you're a nation that is comfortably protected by the nuclear umbrella of a friendly allied superpower. It's easy to tut-tut, scoff, and say "bombs do not protect from bombs." But I have yet to see a nuclear-armed nation ever face an existential threat of invasion from a hostile outside power. Despite how much you might claim they are useless, nuclear-armed countries sure do tend not to get invaded. Notice how Trump routinely talks about invading Iran, but no one talks about toppling the North Korean regime anymore? Or why haven't the Western powers come riding to Ukraine's aid like they did Poland in World War Two? Despite your idealism, as a practical matter, it is not possible to invade and annex a nation that has a nuclear arsenal.

Nuclear weapons, despite how distasteful they are, are the international relations equivalent of "high fences make good neighbors." Canada has been protected by a nuclear arsenal for generations. But they've had the luxury until now of pretending they aren't.

Canada needs the bomb.

[-] Takapapatapaka@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

Youre talking about countries. I do not care abouy contries. Bombs do not protect people, guns do not protect people.

Killing peoples with guns in third world country to avoid killing with bombs in eu/na is not a win. Getting bombs or guns just temporarily deflects the violence on someone else. The day everyone has bombs, wars wont stop.

You cannot want a safe world for people and want bombs at the same time. It is only viable if you think abouy nations instead of people, but who cares?

this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2025
759 points (100.0% liked)

World News

40455 readers
2345 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS