ID: photo of Martin Luther King Jr. waving at the crowd during the March on Washington, on it is his quote: "He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it."
An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.
Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.
If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.
Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low-quality!
0. Only post socialist memes
That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)
1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here
Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.
2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such
That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.
3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.
That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).
4. No Bigotry.
The only dangerous minority is the rich.
5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.
We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.
(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)
6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.
Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.
I understand what you're saying. Yes, Democrats aren't even close to the ideal, but putting pressure on the wound is still better than tearing it open so to speak. "It's not about waiting for the bus that'll take you straight to your destination, which will never come. It's about taking different buses that take you closer to your destination."
The problem though is that there is no bus coming for us. We're standing in the freezing cold waiting for a bus that is promised to us by people that can ride a luxury coach to a warm paradise whenever they want, who have no intention of sending a bus to us because they don't want to share their warm paradise with everyone (it wouldn't be "theirs" if everyone gets to enjoy it.) Whatever bus they do send us takes us to another freezing cold bus stop, some maybe closer to the warm paradise than others, but they're still all freezing cold. The only way we'll get there is if we grind their coaches to a halt, no matter how many bodies it takes throwing at them to jam up the wheels, getting on that bus, taking the wheel by any means necessary, and only THEN do we even have a bus to get anywhere. But relying on their blue coloured bus to be against the red coloured bus that both go nowhere is what a defense for Democrats look like. We'd really be better off figuring out how to stop the luxury coaches so we can start shuttling everyone bit by bit, most people don't even acknowledge the luxury coaches even exist.
This is exactly my thesis on strategic voting. Though, I'd put it as closer to a tourniquet. It stops the bleeding and is life-saving but does not prevent life-changing consequences, like potentially losing a limb in this metaphor. Non-voting/apathy is like just letting it bleed and hoping to survive or at least have an easy death. Anti-electoralism/accelerationism is like not just doing that but also trying to convince others to use up the tourniquet material so that noone has a choice but to bleed out and/or hope that the pile of corpses is placed in the right place to stop the fancy bus.
It fundamentally violates individual agency and uses people as involuntary human sacrifices on, at best, a gamble.
And that's a problem. Voting is not the only necessary tool that has been needed. It can, with enough organization and engagement, be very powerful though. It's also necessary for people to chat with and get positions as the "bus drivers" in order to coax the buses to more friendly destinations. But, that's not possible without support and the organized far-Left in the West (I'd say that I'm part of the "disorganized" far-Left, both because of my anarchic ideals and AuADHD) has pretty much universally rejected any approach involving subverting the existing tools of power and instead taking the same approach as homeopathic "medicine", using strategies without evidence of efficacy that rely ultimately on violence, suffering, and destruction, rather than building.
Part of that is understandable as there's a long history of inflitration of intentional communities and other collaborative efforts, as well assassinations (ex. MLK Jr.). Revolution and positive societal change, however, takes a lot more than just burning things down to actually improve the human condition. A society built on a thirst for blood and vengeance will, as has been seen repeatedly in history, lend itself to instability, vulnerability to hostile influence, internal and external, as well as, you know, the whole mass murder of those that buy into the "correct" philosophy.
An aside: I do, in "conspiracy-theory mode", suspect that polarizing the Left towards anti-electoralism/accelerationism, both removing them, voluntarily, from the reigns of power and making them unwitting allies is at least an idea that is amplified by the authoritarian Right but anything more than that runs into the wall of plausibility.
And that's part of my problem with accelerationism (beyond the lack of evidence of efficacy in doing anything more than increase human suffering). It is ultimately engaging in exactly the same strategies that the existing bourgeoisie employ to maintain and expand their power. Namely, treating the poor and vulnerable as expendable tools to achieve their desired end. It's like the widely memed quote from Shrek "Some of you are going to die but that is a sacrifice that I am willing to make."
Yup. That's why it's necessary to invest the time, effort, and energy into turning the bus that doesn't intend to just run over people for fun into one that actually benefits humanity. It sucks that it requires patience and long-term, multigenerational work but, that's how making lasting change works and why the far-Right is constantly trying to destroy education and support systems to reduce the people's ability to have the energy to think critically or affect positive change.