334
SQL Injection (lemmy.ml)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] hamid@vegantheoryclub.org 3 points 4 days ago

You'd be surprised! The developers at my company are terrible at their jobs and do the bare minimum lol

[-] MyNameIsRichard@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago

Securing the application should be considered the bare minimum.

[-] lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 days ago

I once worked on a codebase where the reset function had a hardcoded default password

[-] MyNameIsRichard@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago

I worked on a codebase like that once. At least it was Base64 encoded.

[-] hamid@vegantheoryclub.org 1 points 4 days ago

Should be, but we all know delivery is lol

[-] xavier666@lemm.ee 1 points 4 days ago

~~Securing~~ Running the application should be considered the bare minimum.

[-] MrAlternateTape@lemm.ee 1 points 4 days ago

Should be, maybe. The reality is that you can spend extra time making the program work, but if it works and you want to spend extra hours on it for whatever reason, it's usually considered a waste of time.

Until they get hacked and it costs incredible amounts of money, that is.

Smart programmers do all the things they need to do before they get everything working. As soon as it works they get pushed to work on something else.

[-] MyNameIsRichard@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago

Security should be built in from the ground up. It's not an afterthought. If you're not doing that, you're not doing it right. I get that there are time constraints but you should factor that in when giving your estimates.

[-] MrAlternateTape@lemm.ee 2 points 4 days ago

Oh I agree. It's just not always how it goes.

this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2025
334 points (100.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

33243 readers
861 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS