327
submitted 2 months ago by PanArab@lemm.ee to c/palestine@lemm.ee
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] banshee@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

A recent article suggests Trump actually lost when you include rejected ballots. https://www.gregpalast.com/trump-lost-vote-suppression-won/

[-] charisma_ken 6 points 2 months ago

"In other words, vote suppression cost Kamala Harris no less than 3,565,000 votes. Harris would have topped Trump’s official total by 1.2 million. Most important, this 2.3% suppression factor undoubtedly cost Harris the states of Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Georgia. If not for the wholesale attack on votes and voters, Harris would have won the election with 286 Electoral votes."

You could consider re-posting the information as a new thread.

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago
[-] banshee@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I don't really know what this is supposed to mean, but I assume it's some kind of silly quip.

Regardless, I'm not arguing for the article - just thought it was interesting.

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

That's ok, normal people will be able to tell what I mean

this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2025
327 points (100.0% liked)

Palestine

312 readers
13 users here now

Posts and comments can be in English and العربية

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS