274
submitted 1 year ago by misk@sopuli.xyz to c/technology@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 65 points 1 year ago

Holy shit, this is going to be hilarious. Imagine the fuckbrains who’d buy this shit.

[-] czardestructo@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

Shell companies for a Russian front.

[-] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

That's libelous. There will also be shell companies for Saudi Arabia and China.

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Just like the trump shoes, and probably most of his grifts

[-] frezik@midwest.social 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They're talking getting 5 or 10 cents for every dollar of debt. Which roughly means the buyers need a 5 to 10 percent chance of getting their money back for the deal to make sense (interest rates complicate the EV calculation, and it's not clear what those are).

This is the banks writing it all off and getting whatever they can out of a bad deal. The buyers will probably make money on the deal, even if Xhitter goes into liquidation.

[-] Gsus4@mander.xyz 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

But what could there be to liquidate? Server racks? They don't even own the offices, it's all rented.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 7 points 1 year ago

Liquidators go through everything. Five toilet rolls in what was an 8-pack? Liquidate it.

IIRC, bankruptcy puts creditors in order, with employees getting whatever pay they're owed first in line, then debtors, and whatever might be left goes to investors. When you paid 5 or 10 cents on the dollar, you don't have to get much back for the deal to be profitable.

[-] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago

I think you’re missing the point. There are no physical assets. There is users and engagement. That can be used to push a narrative or to sell advertising. As users leave, neither works and there is nothing to sell.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago

There are physical assets, though. Hopefully enough to pay employees, and possibly enough for this deal to be profitable. It's a risk, but not a crazy one.

[-] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago

Yes, there are, but minimal physical assets. That's the point. They likely aren't even enough to pay employees.

this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2025
274 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

81869 readers
4639 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS