877
USA comparison (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Majorllama@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

I've never worked a single job in the US that didn't have sick and vacation hours. Granted it was like 5 seconds allowed every 7 years but still.

[-] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 week ago

Neither of them are actually a legal requirement. What is offered is basically part of the "compensation package" (it's considered part of your pay) in the US. Also there are A LOT of jobs in the US that don't give paid sick time or vacation time, they are usually pretty far down the hierarchy though, and the jobs that do give paid time off typically don't give it to you until you have been employed there for at least a year.

I don't think this graphic is stating you cannot get any of these things in the US, but none of these things are guaranteed by the government.

[-] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

At least Illinois requires 40hr of pto/yr

[-] davidagain@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Shit that's crap. That includes all sick days and emergency care of dependents, and bosses get arsey if you take any holiday, right?

[-] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yup. Plus many workplaces have a points system for tardiness or calling off.

Late by 5 minutes = 1/2 point and 5/6 points you're fired. Points drop off after one year.

There's something called FMLA (family medical leave act) which you can use to take additional time off to care for a family member, but it's unpaid.

[-] uis@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

Uuuuuhhhhh. Then you have 0 pto/y.

[-] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

They automatically take your PTO if you call in or are late and you must exhaust your PTO before you can take FMLA. Yeah.

[-] davidagain@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago
[-] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

Yeah, that's why Americans are pissed off all the time.

[-] Nfamwap@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

40 hours? For real?

UK'er here. I get 230 hours of annual leave per year, fully paid. I pay less tax and national insurance on days off, so I actually earn more for not being at work, go figure. 6 months sick at full pay, 6 months at half pay. 4-day week, 36 hours.

When you factor in weekends and bank holidays, I work a grand total of 175 days per year.

As a percentage of the entire hours in a year, I spend just under 19% of them at work. It feels like so much more, but you guys, man, you have it so much worse.

America, land of the free? My arse.

[-] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They just passed that last year. Other states have no requirements to offer you any kind of time off. It's up to you to figure this stuff out when you apply for a job. They generally put some info in the job ad, but it's usually vague. "Two weeks vacation" "health, dental, vision insurance" 401k.

That doesn't tell you anything because there are too many variables to consider. Some companies make you take an entire day off, others have Paid Time Off hours that accrue at a certain rate depending on how long you've been working there, some require you to take at least a certain amount off at a time, some let you use a single hour. Health insurance is a minefield, could be a high deductible plan with a deductible and then you pay a percentage up to your out of pocket max. Sometimes the individual cost is minimal and then jumps considerably for dependents. Dental can cover certain things and not others. Sometimes they will only match your retirement contributions at 50% up to 6% sometimes they'll match them dollar for dollar.

It's a system that makes it difficult to leave a shitty job.

Part time workers rarely get any benefits.

[-] uis@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

28 vacation days/y + holidays. I think 38 pto/y total. In post-Soviet Russia. USSA can't manage be on par with Russia.

[-] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That's just a minimum. Some work places give you more, some don't.

But yeah, it's bullshit.

[-] BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago

i dont even have sick hours anymore its all pto. so if i get sick i just lose my vacation

[-] Majorllama@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Yeah that's a change that kinda sucks. If I'm sick just don't pay me for that day. Don't take it outta my vacation funds lol

[-] stiephelando@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 week ago
[-] Majorllama@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Not exactly sure what you mean in this context. Should I think about taking bigger vacations?

[-] franklin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I think they're saying that those conditions are still poor and you (as in everyone) should fight for more

[-] Majorllama@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Yeah that makes more sense.

Yeah the data all shows and has shown for a long time that people do better work and have better morale when companies treat them better. Unfortunately it costs the companies a little money so GET BACK TO WORK ~~SLAVE~~ EMPLOYEE I DONT CARE IF YOU GET EVERYONE AT WORK SICK.

I will never understand why bosses want me to come into work and potentially take out EVEN more of your staff with illness lol. Like yeah your short handed if I'm gone. You're gonna be even more short handed when all three of your customer service staff get sick Becky.

[-] BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

my company used to do that but now that they went corporate if i call in sick and dont have vacation i get a point if i get too many points i get fired. i already have 3 because i got sick in december. absolute horseshit

[-] Majorllama@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I hope you're able to find better work somewhere else man. That's total BS.

[-] BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

got an interview monday so heres hoping lol

[-] uis@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

Then you don't have pto either.

[-] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

I used to work at a company that did this. White collar, but we would often work stat days, and we were salary. So our PTO was x days vacation time, y days stat days, and z days sick days. Vacation time was the legally mandated or higher, stat days were the legally mandated, and then sick days were on top of that (no legally mandated paid sick days where I live). If you got sick a lot (and actually didn't work anyway) you had less vacation time. If you didn't get sick a lot, you had more vacation time. If you worked some stat days, you had even more vacation time. It worked for everybody and meant there was no reason to worry if people were actually sick when they took a sick day - it was just unplanned PTO.

If you get additional PTO to allow for sick days, I'm not sure why you're complaining. That's a perspective issue. If you don't, I definitely get it.

[-] BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

i dont get any additional PTO for sick days, so its basically get lucky enough to not get sick or never take a day off

[-] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 week ago

And many jobs also pay you health insurance. But the point is that in other countries, social security is not attached to your employment. If you get fired, you receive unemployment and health care until you get your next job (details and quality of social system vary per country though).

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Even if you have a job that pays for health insurance, it's still not as good as a universal health system with a single payer. There's deductibles to pay. In Canada, if I need to go to the ER, my biggest financial concern is paying for parking.

And even if you eliminate the deductibles, it's still not as good as a public health system because you also need to worry about whether a provider is in network and then your insurance company can just deny coverage because their whole point is to profit and not doing what their stated purpose is is an easy way to make more profit.

[-] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 week ago

There are different models. For example in Portugal and in the UK there's public health system where you have the right to health care as a citizen, and it's paid by social security, which is a tax on you income. In Germany you instead have mandatory insurance, but the government pays for you if you can't. This you pay a % of your salary but it's not considered a tax. In the end it's just different models of the same thing.

[-] uis@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

In Germany you instead have mandatory insurance

Eeeeh. Isn't UK mandatory insurance too?

in the UK there's public health system where you have the right to health care as a citizen

Because it says as a citizen, not as a human being.

[-] davidagain@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

No, it's called national insurance, but that's just the name they gave it when they started the national health service, state pension, and welfare for those out of work for whatever reason. It's just taxation.

It's free healthcare, not mandatory insurance. Nobody has to ever deal with an insurance company and decisions about your healthcare aren't made by profit motive driven companies.

[-] uis@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

If it does not cover all people, regardless of citizenship and residence, then I call it mandatory health insurance. Yes, it is state-run, but for me covering tourists too should be requirement for healthcare to be called universal.

[-] davidagain@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I didn't call it universal, I called it free. A lot of tourists are covered because of reciprocal agreements with their countries.

It's not mandatory health insurance because you're covered whether you've paid the tax or not, cradle to grave, and the original hypothecated payments haven't covered it for decades.

It's free healthcare. I disagree very strongly with some people having an immigration ruling that they have no recourse to public funds, but that doesn't mean it isn't free healthcare.

[-] uis@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

Derp. You indeed did not say universal. My bad.

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Are the insurance providers in Germany public or for-profit private entities?

[-] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 week ago

There are both. Most people are on the public insurance which is non profit. Rich people sometimes move to private insurance.

[-] samus12345@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah, those bottom two are flat-out wrong. Now, if it said something like "generous paid sick leave/vacation," it remains correct.

[-] Takumidesh@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

No they aren't.

I've worked many jobs, mostly retail and food service that has no option for any pto, sick or otherwise.

If you wanted time off outside of your scheduled hours, you could try to switch shifts with someone, or get someone to cover your shift, or, depending on the company, ask them for unpaid time, some would sometimes allow that, some wouldn't.

[-] samus12345@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Right, but this chart it saying it doesn't exist at all. That's not true. "Universal" paid sick leave/vacation would be a better descriptor than "generous."

[-] uis@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

retail and food service that has no option for any pto, sick or otherwise.

How many frags did you make?

this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2025
877 points (100.0% liked)

Actually Infuriating

370 readers
23 users here now

Community Rules:

Be Civil

Please treat others with decency. No bigotry (disparaging comments about any race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexuality, nationality, ability, age, ). Personal attacks and bad-faith argumentation are not allowed.

Content should be actually infuriatingPolitics and news are allowed, as well as everyday life. However, please consider posting in partner communities below if it is a better fit.

Mark NSFW/NSFL postsPlease mark anything distressing (death, gore, etc.) as NSFW and clearly label it in the title.

Keep it Legal and MoralNo promoting violence, DOXXing, brigading, harassment, misinformation, spam, etc.

Partner Communities

founded 2 weeks ago
MODERATORS