307

Summary

Donald Trump faced backlash after launching the $TRUMP cryptocurrency meme coin, valued at billions, days before his inauguration.

Experts, including former ethics officials, called it a major conflict of interest, as Trump has pledged pro-crypto policies while profiting personally.

First Lady Melania also launched her own coin, $MELANIA.

Critics warn the coins, which lack intrinsic value and are highly volatile, could lead to lawsuits and public losses.

Ethics experts described the move as one of the worst conflicts of interest in modern U.S. presidential history.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago

"America" did not. I'm sick of these articles making it sound like he won big. He didn't. 1.43% . The smallest margin of victory in 25 years.

His idiot followers have no critical thinking skills and voted for all the lies he told them which they are up. They're going to be absolutely devastated under his presidency.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 40 points 1 day ago

Don't forget all the qualified people who didn't vote at all, and instead just said "Meh, it's fine."

Not voting is a choice.

[-] TallonMetroid@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

True, although personally I think "America didn't give enough of a shit to do even the bare minimum of voting" is no less damning.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 16 points 1 day ago

That is precisely what I meant.

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

They're not going to be devastated. No matter how much worse off they will become, they will think they are doing better because the mainstream media of Fox and OAN will tell them they are doing better than ever.

They were fighting for toilet paper under Trump.

[-] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

They won't be devastated. They'll continue to watch the same "news" that will tell them how great the country is doing no matter what happens... and then continue to say how awful the Democrats are, and to blame them for individual problems.

[-] samus12345@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

A plurality of Americans voted for him. It wasn't even EC shenanigans this time. It wasn't a huge margin, no, but more Americans who voted wanted him than any other candidate.

This is not the right use of the word "plurality". A "plurality" voted for Harris as well. Stop trying to disguise what you're saying.

Trump barely one, and it may have had to do with small segments voting in kind. It was not a landslide nor mandate.

[-] samus12345@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

plurality: a number of votes cast for a candidate in a contest of more than two candidates that is greater than the number cast for any other candidate but not more than half the total votes cast

Trump: 77,303,568

Harris: 75,019,230

Others: 2,877,973

75,019,230 + 2,877,973 = 77,897,203

Trump won a plurality of votes. No, it was not a landslide or a mandate, and I never said it was.

A "plurality" is two, friend.

[-] samus12345@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

Words can have more than one definition, friend, and "plurality" has a specific one when referring to voting. I literally linked which definition I'm using.

They're called "synonyms", and the way you're using this word is not one.

[-] samus12345@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That's not what a synonym is at all. I'm not sure if you're a troll or just supremely misinformed. I'm going to settle on troll.

[-] samus12345@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

"Polite" and "cordial" are synonyms. They're two different words that mean the same thing, as your linked definition helpfully says.

"Fire" as in "conflagration" and "fire" as in "to terminate someone from employment" are homonyms. They're two words that are spelled and pronounced the same with different meanings. So it goes with "plurality" having more than one definition.

Friend, you're just flat fucking wrong. Admit it and back instead of being pathetic with the "akshually" bullshit. You used it wrong. Deal.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm sick of these articles

Let's be very clear that corporate news has failed so spectacularly, they can not recover from this. They will not change, and we shouldn't give them any benefit of doubt.

You will need to find a different way of getting the news than from CNN / NBC / NYT or whatever it used to be in the before-times.

this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2025
307 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19455 readers
3295 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS