269
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Syntha@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

The word "some" at the beginning of the headline would have been a perfectly acceptable qualification of the phrase which also would've better described the actual findings of the study.

[-] otp@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I disagree. It doesn't say "all". "Some" is kind of meaningless because it implies it's something that has happened ever. Like most things within the realm of possibility.

Not having the qualifier implies it's a trend -- neither a certainty nor a rarity.

[-] Syntha@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I don't even disagree that it's a fine headline, but this community shits its pants everytime an article isn't extremely accurate in it's headline, so it's funny to suddenly have an army of people descent upon this comment section to defend specifically this one.

"Some" would be more useful in this instance, as it would distinguish it from the general case. That's pretty standard behaviour for news headlines too, right? This study does not concern itself with iron age populations in general but specifically celtic communities between 100 BC and 100 AD in Britain.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago

Who would understand it to mean "every single man" just because it doesn't explicitly say "some"? That would be a pretty strange way to read it.

[-] Syntha@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

I never implied that it would mean "every single man". That's a pretty strange way to read my comment.

this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2025
269 points (100.0% liked)

science

17907 readers
153 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS