13
🤔 Black hole myth busted: they don't suck anything in
(bigthink.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2025
13 points (100.0% liked)
Science
13414 readers
13 users here now
Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
My point isn't that a black hole is unique or anything else of the sort. Heavy objects try to suck in lighter objects around them. The reason I was saying I would only sometimes describe it as being "sucked in" was because that suggests being significantly pulled towards the object, whereas if it is a fairly stable orbit or the object's trajectory being slightly bent, I wouldn't describe it as such (black hole or otherwise). Even with a gas giant, It wouldn't feel wrong to say it sucks in nearby debris.
Ok, then it's not the condition of "being a black hole" what makes it "suck in", but its mass, which can be varied (according to Stephen Hawking, the theoretical minimum mass to form a black hole would be 0.01 mg)
Saying that a black hole "sucks in" in that sense is as valid as saying that any object with mass (like a tenis ball) "sucks in". But I don't think that's what the article was referring to as a "myth", the myth the article targets is the suck power being a particular characteristic of black holes.