749
Did you just assume my rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 3 months ago by Jackie_meaiii to c/196
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Lemminary@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

It implies a sex change op which is quite invasive of people's privacy. It's also inaccurate for a lot of trans folks who may only change their gender expression and avoid the operation altogether, hence the adoption of transgender that has the right emphasis.

[-] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe 1 points 3 months ago

Not what I asked, but understood

[-] Sop 3 points 3 months ago

It seems quite literally what you asked? If not then you should rephrase.

[-] Lemminary@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

What's the issue?
It has the wrong implications.

Sorry, I wasn't clear!

~It~ ~also~ ~sounds~ ~lewd~ ~but~ ~there's~ ~a~ ~similar~ ~debate~ ~about~ ~"queer"~ ~even~ ~though~ ~that~ ~one~ ~has~ ~been~ ~mostly~ ~reclaimed.~

this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2025
749 points (100.0% liked)

196

17508 readers
498 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS