267
submitted 2 years ago by harbo@lemmy.world to c/lemmyworld@lemmy.world

Apparently there's an issue with some instances banning users for criticizing authoritarian governments. Is lemmy.world a safe place to criticize governments?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] GarbageShootAlt@lemmygrad.ml 25 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You know, I agree that he shouldn't have collaborated with America's foreign policy following the sino-soviet split, but I don't think that even puts him as a major candidate in the running.

Edit: He also really should have given the sparrow thing a test run, and there are other criticisms to make, but these are still lesser than the original one. There was bad theory and bad practice in the Cultural Revolution, but overwhelmingly its biggest problem was endangering the revolution that Mao led to establish the PRC in the first place, something for which he deserves credit on account of poverty reduction, drastic increase in life expectancy, land-redistribution, etc. Oh yeah, and the whole "opposing Japanese and British colonialism" thing, since the KMT rolled over for that, but hopefully that goes without saying.

[-] Dapado@lemmy.ml 22 points 2 years ago

It seems like you've left out the part where multiple tens of millions of people died as a result of his policies.

[-] fubo@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Exterminating the sparrows, that was a pretty big oops.

[-] nephs@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

Unfortunately beehaw users won't see your reply, friend. :(

[-] GarbageShootAlt@lemmygrad.ml 20 points 2 years ago

Thank you for letting me know. I always forget about that because I can see their replies. In any case, I'm more worried about what the people on lemmy.world think, since Beehaw has basically become a purpose-built engine of sectarianism, so the content of those replies would be a foregone conclusion.

I'll try to remember to use my lemmy.ml account in the future for this.

[-] nephs@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Only if you really want them to read it. I appreciate it's important to talk to the general audience. :)

[-] edgerunneralexis@dataterm.digital 6 points 2 years ago

Sectarianism toward what ideology, out of curiosity? I couldn't wade through their endless text blobs enough to tell

[-] GarbageShootAlt@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 2 years ago

Ha, fair question! They have plenty of people they dislike, but what I was trying to refer to was their opposition to what they call "tankies" and I call "People who believe that the US lies about its enemies, particularly its big geopolitical rivals." Specifically, while they are conversationally annoying about it, what really bugs me is their campaign to defederate and get others to defederate from spaces they deem "tankie-friendly". I think that really undermines the platform as a whole to pillarize things that way (i.e. closing things off into silos).

"Sectarianism" arguably isn't the right word for that (it has intra-ideology connotations), but I didn't think it was worth splitting hairs over.

this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2023
267 points (100.0% liked)

Lemmy.World Announcements

29156 readers
2 users here now

This Community is intended for posts about the Lemmy.world server by the admins.

Follow us for server news ๐Ÿ˜

Outages ๐Ÿ”ฅ

https://status.lemmy.world

For support with issues at Lemmy.world, go to the Lemmy.world Support community.

Support e-mail

Any support requests are best sent to info@lemmy.world e-mail.

Report contact

Donations ๐Ÿ’—

If you would like to make a donation to support the cost of running this platform, please do so at the following donation URLs.

If you can, please use / switch to Ko-Fi, it has the lowest fees for us

Ko-Fi (Donate)

Bunq (Donate)

Open Collective backers and sponsors

Patreon

Join the team

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS