622
Pragearnant
(lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2025
622 points (100.0% liked)
memes
16512 readers
2589 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.
A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment
Sister communities
- !tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
- !comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
That's anatomically correct. These are the spinous processes cut in half.
It's weird that the baby isn't cut in half too.
Must be twins.
For $50 we can cut the baby up into as many halves as you like.
I'm actually not sure if I'm falling for a joke here, but that's how I remember that a spine looks like
Even if it's a section view, there shouldn't be 2 of them... Or maybe I just don't see it correctly...
Edit: ah, now I somehow see it. But still, it doesn't really look correct with the spinal cord like splitting it. Although given that this would be a bit hard to visualise in a 2D slice...
I'm still not convinced that this is actually correct ;-)
But the penis you’re okay with.
That one didn't seem double on first sight