638
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] potustheplant@feddit.nl 6 points 2 years ago

I'm sure "working hard" is way more important than being attractive on a platform where people pay to watch attractive women naked. Oh, wait...

[-] friendlymessage@feddit.org 21 points 2 years ago

Being attractive is a prerequisite, but not enough. There's a lot of attractive women, not all of them make 1 mio. on OF.

[-] orgrinrt@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Being successful anywhere requires hard work. You can be born into money, but you’ll have to work a lot to be a success yourself, not just a nobody with a lot of money coming from those that were successful. You can be born attractive (and that’s subjective anyway, people have a lot of different tastes and kinks) and without hard work, it’ll not be worth anything.

No idea why you are being so patronizing and dismissive. Either you are bitter and lashing out, or you need a little bit more perspective and general empathy, as in capability to see the world not only from your personal point of view, and the capability to process that, too.

[-] potustheplant@feddit.nl 4 points 2 years ago

This reads like a typical white knight comment one might find on reddit. Lemmy is getting more and more disappointing every day.

If you really believe that a person that makes 1M on OF "deserves" that money and did "hard work" then I don't really think there's anything we can discuss.

[-] frunch@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

If you really believe that a person that makes 1M on OF "deserves" that money and did "hard work" then I don't really think there's anything we can discuss.

Someone sounds a little jelly. Seriously though, there are all kinds of people making way more money than that without doing a damn thing to justify a penny of it. The Internet allows niche means of making money simply because you can "sell" your products to thousands or even millions of people--in this case directly from the comfort of her home. There are plenty of other schemes out there that can be similarly lucrative if you're good at what they want you to do.

Clearly this woman is quite smart to be in that field in the first place, why wouldn't she take the more lucrative route? Wouldn't you?

[-] potustheplant@feddit.nl 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Not jealous at all, just disappointed I guess. I just can't congratulate a person that had the skill/luck/whatever to get 1M with a minimum effort and they then decide to drop out of a job that could actually contribute something to society to do the banal and functionally useless job full time. It's incredibly wasteful.

Also no, I wouldn't go for the "lucrative" route if I already have more than enough money.

Finally, I have several friends that are phd students and you don't have to be super smart to do that. You do need dedication though. But the same can be said for quite a few lines of work.

[-] orgrinrt@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

For someone who doesn’t have anything to discuss, you do have an awful lot to say and keep repeating. Suit yourself.

[-] potustheplant@feddit.nl 1 points 2 years ago

I do have something to discuss. If you prefer to ignore my point then what can I say. Suit yourself.

this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2025
638 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

20648 readers
1177 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Meta Post Tags



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


If you are here asking: "Is this a science meme?"

Probably, yes. We use the Dawkins definition of meme: a replicating idea, not just an image macro with a fact on it. A good post here doesn't need to teach you something. It needs to make you ask something: who, what, where, when, and especially why or how.

Science isn't a filing cabinet of facts, it's a conversation. For example, a photo of an eel or other localized wildlife counts because most people never see one, and wonder is the first step of inquiry. A car meme counts if it makes you curious about what's under the bonnet. If you want to talk about something you noticed in the world, chances are someone else wants to talk about it too.

We moderate for vibe, not category. Pruning is light, especially where a post creates interesting discussion. Experimenting is encouraged.

See the pinned paper on Shitposting as Public Pedagogy if you want the academic case for why this works.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS