888
The Trek Place (lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Pickle_Jr@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 3 days ago

They were even more upfront about it in TOS for some issues too.

I remember many instances where they say "We have women in our crew in the future." It's not like DISCO flaunted around saying "we don't hate gay people in this ship."

Like I understand that DISCO isn't everybody's favorite, and sure it has some issues, but all the flak it got for being "woke" and "preachy" was weird to me.

Part of Kirk's whole thing was preachy speeches, and Picard had many moments too.

Fun fact: Katherine Janeway didn't attend Starfleet Academy; she was in ROTC at the Samantha Carter School of Character Introduction.

I don't care about the woke nonsense. STD has very few redeeming qualities. Bad writing, bad acting. They spent little to no time flushing out the characters. I guess they didn't have time what with the universe about to end every 10 minutes. I only watched for Anthony Rapp, Doug Jones and Michelle Yeoh. Everyone else was a stinker or didn't get enough screen time.

[-] nightwatch_admin@feddit.nl 15 points 3 days ago

I quite agree STD wasn’t everyone’s favourite, in any case it wasn’t mine, although I really tried. But whining about it being woke was just stupid.

[-] Solumbran@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago

Saying discovery is woke with their crew split in two parts, the queer ones all packed together and then the "normal" ones, seems like a stretch.

The gay couple basically adopts the non binary one who is in a couple with the trans one, are friends with the gay engineer, but barely even talk to the rest of the crew? Ah and sex scenes between straight people but the most the gay couple gets is sitting next to each other, brushing teeth and a small kiss (not that it's a bad thing on its own, it forced the writing to actually show a relationship and not just a bunch of sex, which is positive)

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

That did really bother me, shoehorning all the queer people into their own little box after being far more progressive in previous seasons. Literally anyone else on the crew could have adopted Adira (who I didn't really care much for as a character anyway, she was basically SNW Uhura but not as good an actor), but they had it be Stamets and Culber. How about making it, say, Detmer?

[-] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

How about making it, say, Detmer?

Who? You sort of trailed off there; all I'm seeing is a blank space.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

How dare you talk about my pretend girlfriend like that!

[-] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 5 points 2 days ago

but the most the gay couple gets is sitting next to each other, brushing teeth and a small kiss

While you're absolutely right, I think the record should show that tooth brushing scene is one of the sexiest scenes in television history. Those two have some serious on-screen chemistry.

[-] Solumbran@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Once again, the "don't show too much gay" policy they seem to have forced them to show a relationship through actual intimacy, in contrast to the usual "relationship=sex" that shows usually have (which we can see with most heterosexual relationships in the same show, for example). Even the doctor that is portrayed by an actor that, let's say, likes to show his body (most of the google results are him half naked) was not sexualized stupidly like they usually would ; a positive thing, except that it's probably only because they don't want to "show the gay" (Book for example is always naked and fucking).

So yeah, taken independently it's a better relationship image than most relationships in most shows, but in the context it's pretty horrible.

[-] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

So yeah, taken independently it's a better relationship image than most relationships in most shows, but in the context it's pretty horrible.

Absolutely. I think a lot of the audience realize that if they weren't a gay couple, we would see them with their shirts off together at every opportunity.

The silver lining is that the actors are so attractive and doing such a beautiful and convincing job, that the omission makes the show runners look prudish and silly.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

The only issue disco has ever actually had is their serialized episodes. People hate on the other shit cause they're bigots. Its still good Trek. The story is just less flexible.

[-] turmacar@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

I just wish a single ship weren't saving the Federation/Galaxy/Multiverse every season.

It also waffles hard between "The important part of the Federation is it's ideals" and "Section 31 is pretty badass right?".

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

The single ship thing is annoying and its in Picard, too.

[-] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago

The single ship thing is annoying and stupid - except, of course, when...

Spoiler for Picard S3when it's the Enterprise D. When it's Enterprise D getting a victory lap, common sense can sit this one out while I enjoy it.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Okay I can't say I didnt chug that nostalgia juice on that. I totally did. It was sicc.

[-] AppleTea@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 days ago

Have yet to see anything outside of DS9 use Section 31 well. It's inclusion manages to turn what's supposed to be a hopeful story of the future into just another police procedural that happens to use Star Trek™ branded props

[-] turmacar@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Yeah it's nuts how it went from "These are the bad guys. This is antithetical to the point of Star Trek and the Federation." to "Secret agents in space that can just shoot 'bad' guys is cool though right?"

[-] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 6 points 2 days ago

Section 31 is pretty badass, right?

I have to say, I hated that. It feels like C suite "promote our upcoming show" meddling, to me.

[-] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

it’s still good Trek

Everything with Pike and crew and pretty much everyone except Michael is decent Trek. Deus ex Burnham in every century Starfleet exists in is boring as shit and the nacelles not even being attached to the ship anymore is veering into Star Wars level of nonsensical ship design.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

If floating nacelles is what does it for you but you can accept people being torn apart to the atoms and rebuilt somewhere else Idk what to tell ya bud. The saucers detach and float around, idk how that is sensical as it would create unnecessary weak points in the hull of the ship. The worst parts about discovery were how they were stuck trying to tell grand stories instead of being able to focus on the characters much. They didnt have that tight A plot B plot action that Trek does. But it was far from stinky poo poo terrible like most people say.

[-] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The only issue disco has ever actually had is their serialized episodes.

And not spending enough on light bulbs in some episodes. I wondered if my TV was broken, at one point. Lol.

[-] marcos@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

It’s not like DISCO flaunted around saying “we don’t hate gay people in this ship.”

Well, after DS 9 it would just be repetitive. Also TNG spent a few episodes on this exact point, but it wasn't a main topic.

But people tend to focus their complains about things being "preachy" when those things put the preach above the story-telling. DISCO absolutely had this flaw in some point or another. Never for very long, though, so it really wasn't a main characteristic. Anyway, when a show is simply good, almost nobody gets bothered by the preaching.

this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2024
888 points (100.0% liked)

TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name

3895 readers
1153 users here now

/c/TenFoward: Your home-away-from-home for all things Star Trek!

Re-route power to the shields, emit a tachyon pulse through the deflector, and post all the nonsense you want. Within reason of course.

~ 1. No bigotry. This is a Star Trek community. Remember that diversity and coexistence are Star Trek values. Any post/comments that are racist, anti-LGBT, or generally "othering" of a group will result in removal/ban.

~ 2. Keep it civil. Disagreements will happen both on lore and preferences. That's okay! Just don't let it make you forget that the person you are talking to is also a person.

~ 3. Use spoiler tags. This applies to any episodes that have dropped within 3 months prior of your posting. After that it's free game.

~ 4. Keep it Trek related. This one is kind of a gimme but keep as on topic as possible.

~ 5. Keep posts to a limit. We all love Star Trek stuff but 3-4 posts in an hour is plenty enough.

~ 6. Try to not repost. Mistakes happen, we get it! But try to not repost anything from within the past 1-2 months.

~ 7. No General AI Art. Posts of simple AI art do not 'inspire jamaharon'

~ 8. No Political Upheaval. Political commentary is allowed, but please keep discussions civil. Read here for our community's expectations.

Fun will now commence.


Sister Communities:

!startrek@lemmy.world

!memes@lemmy.world

!tumblr@lemmy.world

!lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Want your community to be added to the sidebar? Just ask one of our mods!


Honorary Badbitch:

@jawa21@startrek.website for realizing that the line used to be "want to be added to the sidebar?" and capitalized on it. Congratulations and welcome to the sidebar. Stamets is both ashamed and proud.


Creator Resources:

Looking for a Star Trek screencap? (TrekCore)

Looking for the right Star Trek typeface/font for your meme? (Thank you @kellyaster for putting this together!)


founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS