145
submitted 1 day ago by Garibaldee@lemm.ee to c/usa@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 day ago

Seems that they only counted slaves from the South. I bet that including New England slave owners would take it from "many" to "most", if not even "almost all".

While not on an industrial scale like in the South, there was still a lot of slavery in the original colonies and their successor states, which played a big part in enabling generational wealth for any family rich enough to buy a slave at the time.

this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
145 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7300 readers
478 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS