322
submitted 1 week ago by sad_detective_man to c/196
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] takeda@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

He sent this tweet two hours after the incident. No one knew at the time what were the motivations behind it. All they knew at the time was that CEO of subsidary headquartered in Minnesota was shot (by accident or otherwise) and that was it. We later learned the rest.

What were the gun related deaths that weren't tweeted about?

By all means I don't feel sorry for this guy, I agree with the sentiment, but I don't want politicians to be the ones asking to murder someone. I want them to regulate, so killing people this way is not possible.

[-] odium@programming.dev 34 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
[-] takeda@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Ok so 124 victims of gun violence in Minnesota in 2023 without any context. It could be gang violence, shot by police, suicide etc. When you say somebody didn't comment about someone else's death you would know the victim name and some background story what happened.

[-] noscere@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago

Wait, SO you are both defending Wallz for sending a condolences tweet for a dead evil CEO because there wasn't any context to the killing yet, and defending him for not tweeting about the other 124 victims in his state because there wasn't enough context. Kinda sounds like you are just defending Wallz because you like him.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2024
322 points (100.0% liked)

196

16710 readers
2133 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS