645
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] AliasAKA@lemmy.world 67 points 21 hours ago

If only there was a highly efficient mode of transporting people that didn’t use tires. Ah well, nothing can be done I guess.

[-] 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works 11 points 14 hours ago

My city's metro system uses rubber tyres, :(

[-] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 7 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I imagine it's still orders of magnitudes better than everyone driving their own car in.

Same with busses. Don't let perfect be the enemy of the good

[-] Scrollone@feddit.it 21 points 19 hours ago

Yes, imagine if there was a fast and safe way of transport. Something like made to run on steel bars in order to reduce friction. I don't know. I'm just imagining, I watch too much science fiction.

[-] Echolynx@lemmy.zip 11 points 19 hours ago

To be fair, the most efficient mode of transportation is cycling by far. I wonder if bike tires also contribute to this.

[-] Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee 27 points 19 hours ago

I'm sure they do but it will be way less.

[-] Pulptastic@midwest.social 14 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

The wear rate should be proportional to the weight of the system (car plus cargo and passsengers, bike plus cargo and riders), maybe with some correction factors for things that affect wear rate like knobbiness.

Since bikes weigh a couple orders of magnitude less on average, the amount of tire wear material should also be a couple orders of magnitude less.

Edit: other lemmyer said wear is proportional to weight to the 4th power and that may be correct. I vaguely recall that from school now that they mentioned it.

[-] sping@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 4 hours ago

should be proportional to the weight of the system

It's that really true? Wear to the roads is proportional to the fourth power of axle weight so I would never have predicted a linear relationship.

[-] aim_at_me@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 hour ago

Exponential relationships are still proportional.

[-] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

Doesn't speed/acceleration affect it? If that is the case, that's another pro for bikes.

[-] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe 2 points 12 hours ago

Assuming the material properties and physical design of the two tire types is identical, maybe

[-] Tire@lemmy.ml 20 points 19 hours ago

Bikes cause thousands of times less damage to streets so I wouldn’t be surprised if they also wear less.

[-] Scrollone@feddit.it 8 points 19 hours ago

And the size of bike tires is way less than a car tire.

[-] Echolynx@lemmy.zip 9 points 19 hours ago

Good point! Also much less weight.

this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2024
645 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

9692 readers
1166 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS