592
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Well, I didn't construct this description out of thin air. It's based on how the concept of individual rights has been explained to me by various people over the years.

[-] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 days ago

So, you've been listening to stupid people.

[-] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Well, you weren't around. In the future, I'll be sure to consult you first.

[-] 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 days ago

Natural rights vs positive rights debate depends on your personal secularity. If you believe first degree rights can only be emitted by unfalsifiable entities and you wish to keep those rights, then your stuck with those potentially undemocratic organisations who make questionable knowledge about those unfalsifiable entities. The alternative would be to accept that people can empower themselves and dismantle discrimination (ie rights) in democratic processes.

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago
[-] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

I don't have a written record of every interaction I've ever had regarding this topic, unfortunately.

However, I've had a number of conversations or debates that have gone something like:

I will say that rights are essentially meaningless without a sufficiently strong state to enforce said rights, and they'll reply that the state doesn't grant rights, they can only take them away, and that the rights are theirs even if the state doesn't recognize or enforce them. These conversations are usually with people who are very suspicious of state authority, even going so far as wanting to see the state abolished completely.

It's kind of understandable, they're usually American and one of the foundational documents of the US famously states that "...all men are...endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights..." Every child in the US is taught this, more or less from birth.

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Either a right is something that you have regardless of location and scenario. Or it's something you can take away. I'm not seeing how anything meets both the criteria that you're mentioning.

But again, any tangible example would be helpful.

this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
592 points (100.0% liked)

Atheism

4062 readers
149 users here now

Community Guide


Archive Today will help you look at paywalled content the way search engines see it.


Statement of Purpose

Acceptable

Unacceptable

Depending on severity, you might be warned before adverse action is taken.

Inadvisable


Application of warnings or bans will be subject to moderator discretion. Feel free to appeal. If changes to the guidelines are necessary, they will be adjusted.


If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a group that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of any other group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you you will be banned on sight.

Provable means able to provide proof to the moderation, and, if necessary, to the community.

 ~ /c/nostupidquestions

If you want your space listed in this sidebar and it is especially relevant to the atheist or skeptic communities, PM DancingPickle and we'll have a look!


Connect with Atheists

Help and Support Links

Streaming Media

This is mostly YouTube at the moment. Podcasts and similar media - especially on federated platforms - may also feature here.

Orgs, Blogs, Zines

Mainstream

Bibliography

Start here...

...proceed here.

Proselytize Religion

From Reddit

As a community with an interest in providing the best resources to its members, the following wiki links are provided as historical reference until we can establish our own.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS