1741
submitted 1 year ago by Mubelotix@jlai.lu to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Norgur@kbin.social 54 points 1 year ago

Let's not forget that there's money to be earned by being a youtube person. Creating a model that would make this possible in a federated approach would be bonkers as hell and probably just invite predatory dipshits who then lure creators with seemingly good offers and then start to hold them hostage in ways YouTube hasn't dared so far.

[-] Gatsby@lemm.ee 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

lure creators with seemingly good offers and then start to hold them hostage in ways YouTube hasn't dared so far.

Like Smosh?

Young up and coomers, first giants on YouTube. Sold their channel and brand for stock. Then were tied to the company for years who worked them like dogs. Until the company that bought them went bankrupt so their stock was nullified and they in the end sold their company for $0.

I wouldn't say YouTube was free from it

[-] InfiniWheel@lemmy.one 7 points 1 year ago

Young up and coomers

I don't think that word means what you think it means

[-] Gatsby@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

It was intentional

[-] Kichae@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Most professional YouTubers survive primarily off of Patreon support and sponsored videos. YouTube ads provide only a small fraction of what they earn. If they could increase their Patreon or sponsorship income by cross-posting to PeerTube, then they could be enticed to do so. The current issue there is that sponsors are going to want accurate analytics, and PeerTube isn't going to be able to offer the kind of depth of audience analysis that YouTube can.

The problem is, the cost of hosting videos -- both in terms of storage and in terms of bandwidth -- is kind of prohibitive. That part needs to be solved.

[-] hoodatninja@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] Neve8028@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The reality is that most content creators will not switch platforms because it guarantees a significant loss of viewership. Ad reads won't pay much if you're only talking to a fraction of your audience.

[-] Stormy404@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

good. i don't want capitalist advertising bs on the internet anyway.

[-] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

While I agree in spirit, what other option is there in a capitalist society? Paying a subscription fee for every single service or every single content creator? Not sure people are going to go for that en masse.

this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2023
1741 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

45581 readers
1420 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS