573
Investment rule (slrpnk.net)
submitted 1 month ago by Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to c/196
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] HollowNaught@lemmy.world 124 points 1 month ago

Oh

Oh dear

We're fucked, aren't we?

[-] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 97 points 1 month ago

Hopefully people remember and learn from the Australian government who allowed water to be traded like stocks. The idea was that farmers and companies that needed water most would pay for water rights from people who didn't need it.

In practice it lead to mega rich foreigners buying up all the water rights in Australia and preventing anyone from using them which created artificial scarcity and drove up prices. These mega rich foreigners then sold Australians their own water back to them at exorbitant prices.

[-] BenLeMan@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago

Yes, "people" will remember how easy it is to get filthy rich when all you have to do is cast your morals aside and exploit the basic needs of human beings. This will be a glowing example for generations of "entrepreneurs".

[-] Dasus@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

In practice it lead to mega rich foreigners buying up all the water rights in Australia and preventing anyone from using them which created artificial scarcity and drove up prices. These mega rich foreigners then sold Australians their own water back to them at exorbitant prices.

Oh hey I've seen this movie

[-] horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

I do not support it. However the thrust of the article was to invest in water treatment and water conservation tech companies essentially.

But yeah. Water, food housing and healthcare should all be free.

[-] tb_@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Also it leads to those with a lot of land to capture and store the rain, which means there's even less water in the river to go around.

[-] Goodtoknow@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago

Sounds like housing in Canada 😓

[-] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 47 points 1 month ago

This has been a known outcome for at least 30 years.

Yes. We are. We have been for a long time.

It's just becoming more visible to the first world.

[-] Ketchup@reddthat.com 2 points 1 month ago

Yes. And in “The Big Short” Michael Burry went on to invest in CA water table futures. He’s already profited from that in CA.

[-] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago

pops a can of air

Yeah, probably.

this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
573 points (100.0% liked)

196

16708 readers
3170 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS