391
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by sosodev@lemmy.world to c/fediverse@lemmy.world

Disclaimer: I wrote this article and made this website.

There was some talk of this issue in the recent fediverse inefficiencies thread. I'm hopeful that in the future we'll have a decentralized solution for file hosting but for now I deeply believe that users should pay for their own file hosting.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Is a p2p system for media with the instances just hosting magnet links too slow for fediverse purposes? To me this seems like the most resilient way to handle media in a decentralized system

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

If a social network is to take off, it must be accessible from mobile devices behind CGNAT (carrier grade network address translation).

[-] 56_@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

p2p from behind a CGNAT works just fine as long as a single server is accessible and can mediate connections between other peers. Most non-servers are behind some sort of NAT these days.

[-] pinkystew@reddthat.com 1 points 1 week ago
[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

Because that’s where all the users are. The “social” aspect of a “social” network. Anyone can host a forum but it’s useless without users.

this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2024
391 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

28380 readers
449 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS