27

I have a desktop PC with two SSDs—one with Windows installed and the other currently empty, which I plan to use for Linux as I migrate to it. Additionally, I have two 4TB HDDs I intend to configure for NAS storage.

Since I can't afford a dedicated NAS setup just yet, I’m considering dedicating a portion of the empty SSD to run a NAS solution like TrueNAS or Proxmox for self-hosting. Ideally, I'd like the NAS portion to operate continuously in the background, while allowing me to boot into either Linux or Windows as usual.

Is it possible to set up the NAS environment this way, so it’s always running and accessible, even as I switch between Linux and Windows on my main system?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 30 points 8 months ago

Not in a way you're probably going to like.

You could set up a bare metal hypervisor on the system and set up a VM for your NAS, Windows, and Linux and swap between them as needed, but uh, that's not really an exceedingly pleasant desktop use case, for a number of reasons, one of which is that you really won't have the normal 'sit down, and use the computer' desktop experience.

Alternate option: run the NAS and either the Linux or Windows install in a VM, and keep it booted into, say, the desktop Linux environment with everything else being a virtualized setup.

[-] ExperiencedWinter@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I'm basically running this setup with Unraid as my hypervisor. It's definitely doable, but takes a lot of tinkering to get everything up and running and games with super strict anti cheat won't run at all. I would only recommend going this route if you really enjoy tinkering, I'd say finding a cheap second hand PC for your NAS is probably much less work.

[-] umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml 7 points 8 months ago

Unless you want to game. Anti-cheats are notorlessly anti-virtual machines.

Fair, but he said he wants to move from Windows to Linux, so I just assumed there wasn't going to be any of those since, well, they're not going to run in Linux anyways.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago

I use Linux full time and I tried using my desktop as my NAS, and even then it was annoying.

Just get a second device to use as a NAS if you actually need one, or if it's just you, share files on a separate drive/partition between Windows and Linux. It's not worth getting fancy with one device.

this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2024
27 points (100.0% liked)

Selfhosted

49964 readers
157 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS