144
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2024
144 points (100.0% liked)
Politics
719 readers
110 users here now
For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.
Rule 1: Posts have the following requirements:
▪️ Post articles about the US only
▪️ Title must match the article headline
▪️ Recent (Past 30 Days)
▪️ No Screenshots/links to other social media sites or link shorteners
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. One or two small paragraphs are okay.
Rule 3: Articles based on opinion (unless clearly marked and from a serious publication-No Fox News or equal), misinformation or propaganda will be removed.
Rule 4: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.
Rule 5: Be excellent to each other. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7. No conjecture type posts (this could, might, may, etc.). Only factual. If the headline is wrong, clarify within the body. More info
Bookmark Vault of Trump's First Term
Media owners, CEOs and/or board members
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Even if Musk's lawyers don't succeed in making this go away and the whole thing does turn out to have been illegal, it won't make any difference: the election will be long over by then
Just another example of the privilege that money buys.
Best legal system money can buy
We still have to fight for him to be held accountable.
Well, that's another thing. How likely is it he'll ever see any real consequences that affect him in any way?
Not that I'm saying he shouldn't be prosecuted if this does turn out to be illegal (which it probably is), just that I'm extremely cynical when it comes to the likelihood of it actually having any effect
Well, he's definitely fucking around and ig we'll all find out.
Common law, right? Even if the resolution doesn't have a practical impact now, it's important to set a precedent (hopefully to prevent such things in the future).
But isn't the point that it's pretty clearly illegal already, which is why they're now framing it as something else?
As long as rich reich-wingers can just throw lawyers at something that looks like vote buying, they can drag things out until elections are over and then it'll be too late – can't undo the effect post hoc.