330

‘Death is everywhere’: fears grow that Israel plans to seize land in Gaza (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 2 days ago by Silverseren@fedia.io to c/world@lemmy.world

32 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Israel has tightened its siege of northern Gaza in the face of warnings from the UN and other aid agencies that hundreds of thousands of Palestinian lives at are risk, raising questions over whether the Netanyahu government’s ultimate war aims include territorial expansion.

The IDF says it is hunting Hamas militants but suspicions are growing that Israel is putting into practice a blueprint it had officially distanced itself from, known as the “generals’ plan”.

The plan, named after the retired senior officers promoting it, was intended to depopulate northern Gaza by giving the Palestinians trapped there an opportunity to evacuate and then treating those that stayed as combatants, laying total siege.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 30 points 2 days ago

Whem Kamala wins, there needs to be mass protest everywhere she goes. She needs to step in and safe what is left of a great group of people.

[-] drake@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 12 hours ago

We need to stop expecting change to come from our rulers. We need to take change into our own hands.

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Why would she listen to a word of it after the election?

[-] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 day ago

Bc enough people standing together can change minds. Let a million people show up at your house, you will think twice about stuff.

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

protesting against zionist violence and land theft has all but been outlawed.

But if this was two months ago, I'd agree with that. Thats why I was hoping more people would sign onto the uncommitted movement when we had a chance to let biden/harris know that supporting genocide wasnt going to be permitted by the voters.

[-] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah, that worked though. Biden stepped down and was replaced with Harris. That is extremely rare. His debate didnt help but different states voming back with 1-8% uncommited/other was also a driving force.

Right now we need to defeat the local threat before we can put presser on the over seas threat. I.e russia and isreal

[-] nutsack@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

depends on what the protests look like

[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If Kamala wins the biggest fear is liberals not demonstrating out of complacency. Similar to how the George Floyd movement died after Biden was elected. But subsequent years police violence has gotten worse.

Whomever wins this time, mass protests. Instantly. Everywhere.

[-] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

For real change, we need to change local for cops. States hold police in check and unfortunately federal has little they can do.

Also Biden never had control of the house. He would need that for any federal change. I personally was effected by the police and wish my federal reps could do something. However, I live in a gerrymander hell hole called North Carolina.

But you are right, we need to stand united against the murdering of the palestinians.

this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2024

330 points (100.0% liked)

World News

38970 readers

1663 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.