398
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

As the title states I am confused on this matter. The way I see it, the USA has a two party system and in the next few weeks they’re either going to have Trump or Harris as president, come inauguration day. With this in mind doesn’t it make sense to vote for the person least likely to escalate the situation even more.

Giving your vote to an independent or worse not voting at all, just gives more of a chance for Trump to win the election and then who knows what crazy stuff he will allow, or encourage, Israel to get away with.

I really don’t get the logic. As sure nobody wants to vote for a party allowing these heinous crimes to be committed, but given you’re getting one of them shouldn’t you be voting for the one that will be the least horrible of the two.

Please don’t come at me with pro-Israeli rhetoric as this isn’t the post for that, I’m asking about why people would make such choices and I’m not up for debate on the Middle East, on this post, you can DM me for that.

Edit: Bedtime here now so will respond to incoming comments in the morning, love starting the day with an inbox full 😊.

Edit 2: This blew up, it’s a little overwhelming right now but I do intent on replying to everybody that took the time to comment. Just need to get in the right headspace.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

I never understood the intense laser focus some people put on one policy. There's so many to care about if you're American. People are dying from homelessness, starvation, guns, and mental health every single day but the only thing you care about is overseas? That's not even mentioning things like a woman's right to dictate what happens to their own body.

[-] krolden@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 weeks ago

Those homeless could have homes if the billions of dollars stopped going to propping up genocidal regimes and the military industrial complex

[-] verdigris@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago

Oh sick is Trump campaigning on that??

[-] zazazaza@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 weeks ago

Oh sick is Kamala campaigning on that??

[-] verdigris@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago

Answer to both: no. So maybe we should use other factors to decide!

[-] TheKingBee@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

The democrats are incapable of solving those problems...

[-] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

I've at least heard plans to help with them instead of concepts of a plan

[-] sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Are you equating something monumental like a genocide with some thing trivial like school vouchers? Maybe you should consider that some issues are more impactful and important than others.

this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
398 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43893 readers
669 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS