1047
submitted 2 months ago by moe90@feddit.nl to c/technology@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] hitwright@lemmy.world 38 points 2 months ago

I'm surprised how many people treat GPL to ignore borders. The IP law still operates only by the rules your country decides.

I can understand the desire for information to be free, but unless Open source movement becomes it's own country the discussion should end there.

[-] polar@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

Nobody says to ignore the law... it is Linus comments that were bad. Instead of defending the people that was working for him all these years and he had trust on them, he decided to throw them under the bus because he is from Finland. Well, Finland prospered the most on its life under neutrality.

[-] hitwright@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

Well I guess if he trusts them, he will welcome in open arms once the sanctions are lifted. Or if they get a non russian state domain to operate from.

[-] polar@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

With those incendiary comments he did on the people that worked for him for years... I doubt they will be back. If he did not trust them, he would have gotten rid of them years ago. He waited to the deadline to kick them out... good, so he trusted them till now... but then, he despise them from being Russian. I simply don't get it... I don't know... maybe Linus is just an ass or he was forced to say that... I think probably the first.

[-] aidan@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

I can understand the desire for information to be free, but unless Open source movement becomes it’s own country the discussion should end there.

Ideally the internet would be extra-sovereign

[-] nomadjoanne@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago
[-] vxx@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Did they get paid?

Edit: Very likely they were paid, and that's where IP addresses end and sanctions begin.

Every worker within an organization has to be paid, somehow.

Somebody must bear the costs of the supposedly “free (gratis).” In the end, nothing is truly free cost. And, not a single person would work for free (no payment, compensation, or benefits, or in other words, gratis) full-time.

It is an absurdity to think otherwise.

Free and open-source software is handed out at zero-cost to make it possible to lower the barrier of entrance; to make it as widely available as possible. Knowledge should, indeed, be free (gratis).

https://medium.com/@uriadonayherrera/economics-in-foss-is-paying-for-free-and-open-source-software-an-investment-or-an-expense-19f187db8d5a

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago
[-] vxx@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Where did you get volunteers from?

It's about people on the maintainers list, and those are paid.

That it's open software doesn't mean people are working for free.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

You made a declarative statement that nobody would work full time for free.

So explain volunteers.

[-] vxx@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Where did I make that statement?

Do you mean the article that I posted?

this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
1047 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

60097 readers
2011 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS