627
Misgendering does not rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 5 months ago by unlawfulbooger to c/196
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Gladaed@feddit.org 10 points 5 months ago

Yes, but actually no. Using deadnames of companies is much more acceptable than for people.

[-] Glytch@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

Despite what the Supreme Court will tell you, corporations aren't actually people, so you don't have to worry about dead naming them.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

Deadnaming is not necessarily misgendering. Sometime people have deadnames for reasons other than gender.

this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
627 points (100.0% liked)

196

17478 readers
1279 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS