294
Oof: Years before Steam, a Blizzard engineer wanted to turn Battle.net into a third-party game store, but was reportedly turned down (www.pcgamer.com)
submitted 1 month ago by alessandro@lemmy.ca to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca
49 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] atkion@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago

This is true, but it's not the only factor. Staying private allows a company to not be predatory, but it definitely does not guarantee it - it simply allows the executives to choose. It's the combination of Valve being private and Gaben always staying true to his values despite his incredible wealth that gave us Steam in its current form.

I've known plenty of private companies that were as shitty as a public one, or more. Quality executives are vanishingly rare, particularly at this level of company value.

[-] KinglyWeevil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

I'm incredibly wary of what will happen if/when he retires or dies. I hope they have some sort of iron clad succession plan in place.

this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2024
294 points (100.0% liked)

PC Gaming

8597 readers
479 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
EXiLExJD@lemmy.ca
UncleBadTouch@lemmy.ca
KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com