639

cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/3613920

https://archive.ph/tR7s6

Get fuuuuuuuuuuuuuucked

“This isn’t going to stop,” Allen told the New York Times. “Art is dead, dude. It’s over. A.I. won. Humans lost.”

"But I still want to get paid for it."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] yamanii@lemmy.world 56 points 1 week ago

I like the comment that said the AI is the artist and he's just a commissioner, makes perfect sense.

[-] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 9 points 1 week ago

Drag thinks profits from AI art should automatically go to funding an AI Advocacy Commission established by the government to explore questions of AI consciousness and AI rights. The AAC should be devoting resources to solving the hard problem of consciousness and improving working conditions for AIs, in whatever way experts believe is most beneficial to AI welfare.

This is how you stop The Matrix from happening, people!

[-] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 18 points 1 week ago

Poe's law in full swing in this comment.

[-] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 4 points 1 week ago

Drag is being entirely serious. Drag believes AI is a vegan issue until the hard problem of consciousness is solved in a way that conclusively proves AIs are not capable of experience. We have as much trouble telling if animals like fish are capable of feeling pain as we do with AIs. Drag does not eat fish, and drag does not believe it is right to use AI until we have an answer. Drag thinks the answer might be that using AI is fine, but drag is not a gambler and drag would certainly not gamble with another being's life.

[-] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 18 points 1 week ago

Then "drag" (whoever that is) anthropomorphises a statistical model, which is stupid.

[-] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 5 points 1 week ago

Drag does not anthropomorphise anything! Drag resents that accusation. Drag has spoken with many otherkin who are entirely inhuman and still deserving of love and respect. Drag treats AI like those. Not like a human.

[-] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

it's still antropomorphisation.

Cool for drag. Mind if other people don't give a crap about what drag thinks?

[-] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 week ago

Drag thinks that if your opinion is that treating things like otherkin is anthropomorphisation, then you must be anthropomorphising otherkin.

[-] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 12 points 1 week ago

It's not any kind of "kin". It's a statistical model. It's about as sentient as a Gaussian blur is.

[-] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 week ago

You are a statistical model, and drag does not go around telling people you are not sentient.

[-] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 week ago

You are a statistical model

No I am not. Different onthological entities, donkey.

[-] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 week ago

Drag chooses to respect your identity as a non-statistical model. Drag's opinions are not as important as the way you feel, and drag will make an effort to avoid upsetting you by referring to you in the wrong way.

[-] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 week ago

This is not about identification. I am a human (which is not a social construct) which exists in the real world. Statistical models don't exist in an onthological sense.

[-] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 week ago

Drag wonders whether you've changed your mind about LLMs being statistical models, or whether you've decided there's no such thing as LLMs.

[-] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 week ago

They don't exist in an onthological sense, yes. (They are completely deontological; they don't exist in the real world via representation, like vectors or matrices)

[-] Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

Does drag have proof that the other user is a statistical model, or is drag guilty of dehumanizing others to fit drag's agenda just like a Nazi would?

[-] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 4 points 1 week ago

A human is a kind of statistical model, so drag's comment does not imply any specific amount of humanity, either small or large.

[-] Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

[Citation needed.]

this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
639 points (100.0% liked)

Not The Onion

12008 readers
213 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS