212
submitted 2 weeks ago by zlatiah@lemmy.world to c/science@lemmy.world

"... Researchers are hoping to do that now that they have a new map — the most complete for any organism so far — of the brain of a single fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster). The wiring diagram, or ‘connectome’, includes nearly 140,000 neurons and captures more than 54.5 million synapses, which are the connections between nerve cells.

... The map is described in a package of nine papers about the data published in Nature today. Its creators are part of a consortium known as FlyWire, co-led by neuroscientists Mala Murthy and Sebastian Seung at Princeton University in New Jersey."

See the associated Nature collection: The FlyWire connectome: neuronal wiring diagram of a complete fly brain, which also has links to the nine papers

All nine papers are open access!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

So can we model this now?

Can we use this data to essentially emulate a fruit fly's behavioral patterns?

Like can we just wire this up in a software neural network, feed it some inputs, and see what happens?

[-] Takumidesh@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

As far as I understand, not really, as neural networks are more of a metaphor than an analogue. They don't have a one to one correspondence to brain neuron behavior.

In a physical (as in physics) sense, it’s because software neural nets are inherently digital, whereas actual neurons function in the analog (in terms of electrical impulses, as well as chemically) domain. We don’t have tech to accurately and effectively represent all of that.

[-] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Audio is inherently analogue, but you can record it into digital formats just fine.

It's tempting to say "well, that's different though" but it really isn't.

Just like with audio, you'll need high enough fidelity encoding to make it all work, otherwise you end up with garbage.

[-] zlatiah@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Based on my understanding of how these things work: Yes, probably no, and probably no... I think the map is just a "catalogue" of what things are, not at the point where we can do fancy models on it

This is their GitHub account, anyone knowledgeable enough about research software engineering is welcomed to give it a try

There are a few neuroscientists who are trying to decipher biological neural connections using principles from deep learning (a.k.a. AI/ML), don't think this is a popular subfield though. Andreas Tolias is the first one that comes to my mind, he and a bunch of folks from Columbia/Baylor were in a consortium when I started my PhD... not sure if that consortium is still going. His lab website (SSL cert expired bruh). They might solve the second two statements you raised... no idea when though.

this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2024
212 points (100.0% liked)

science

14547 readers
210 users here now

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about

I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS