626
submitted 1 month ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

The Alternative for Germany (AfD) has gained ground in three recent state elections, caused an uproar in the Thuringian parliament and triggering another debate on whether to ban the party outright.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jeena@piefed.jeena.net 14 points 1 month ago

Banning one of the the biggest democratic parties to save democracy.

I wonder how that would go. It's the paradox that you have to be intolerant to intolerance.

[-] Darkard@lemmy.world 82 points 1 month ago

There is no paradox.

Tolerance is a social contract that both guides and protects your actions. If you breach that contract by being a cunt then you are no longer afforded it's protections for the same.

Nazis demand you accept them while demonising others and will continue to take advantage of you being "tolerant" for as long as you allow it.

[-] mustbe3to20signs@feddit.org 55 points 1 month ago

one the biggest parties

FTFY, there is nothing remotely democratic about those people.

[-] itslilith 22 points 1 month ago

They are not a democratic party

[-] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 1 month ago

Google paradox of tolerance.

[-] Siegfried@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

We banned the fascist party in my country for 20 years. It accounted something like 55-60 % of the votes, back in the day.

It didn't work well.

[-] andrewta@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Which country? What happened when they tried?

[-] Siegfried@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Argentina. Peronism got proscribed for ~20 years (1955-1973). It's a lot more complicated than that cause it actually was fascist vs conservatives*.

Ellected governments had little to no real power cause +50% of the people were not allowed to vote, so the faction that started winning power was the military. Every excuse was a good one to take down the government and bring up another dictatorship.

*refined fascists

[-] Carrolade@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

I'm not sure we can call Peronism fascist. While it was populist and nationalistic, it's missing that hallmark blood-and-soil (this land for our bloodline) aspect that really marks out fascist ideologies.

You can't really call yourself fascist if you're trying to say all your people are equal, you need to be trying to establish some sort of hierarchical order where these citizens are always better than those citizens.

[-] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 5 points 1 month ago

Anybody can come to the party as long as you bring your own beer.

The AfD brought crack.

[-] somenonewho@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago

The last time they tried to ban a party in Germany was the NPD (another Nazi party) and at the end the Supreme Court decided the reason not to ban them, even though they were clearly unconstitutional , was because they were to few/insignificant (in the end they banned them from receiving party funding which still has a massive effect).

So you couldnt ban them because they were to small and you can't ban the AfD because they're to big? Just because enough people vote for a party doesn't mean they're not unconstitutional.

[-] Fallenwout@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

You getting downvoted shows how hypocrite the internet collective is. Democracy for everyone unless they don't like the result.

this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2024
626 points (100.0% liked)

World News

39019 readers
1736 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS