426
submitted 3 months ago by Stopthatgirl7@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

An artist who infamously duped an art contest with an AI image is suing the U.S. Copyright Office over its refusal to register the image’s copyright. 

In the lawsuit, Jason M. Allen asks a Colorado federal court to reverse the Copyright Office’s decision on his artwork Theatre D’opera Spatialbecause it was an expression of his creativity.

Reuters says the Copyright Office refused to comment on the case while Allen in a statement complains that the office’s decision “put me in a terrible position, with no recourse against others who are blatantly and repeatedly stealing my work.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Ahh yes, the camera bullshit. Here we go…

Yes a photographer is an artist. They need to know light diffusion, locational effects, distance and magnification, aperture, shutter speed, and have a subject prepped and able to take direction. They also have to have an insane understanding of post process editing.

They don’t simply type a sentence into a computer and get beautiful photographs.

A child can produce the exact same image by simply typing the exact same sentence into a computer.

A child cannot be given a camera and be tasked to produce the exact same quality photo of a professional photographer- and succeed.

So stop with this bullshit comparison. It’s apples and oranges.

[-] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 10 points 3 months ago

Did you read the rest of the comment or did you stop after the first sentence?

[-] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago

I didn’t need to. The moment photography was brought up as a comparison, that’s all I needed to know.

AI is not art. Period.

[-] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 12 points 3 months ago

Let's say I've been an artist for 10 years. I take all my work and stick it into an AI model. That model starts generating images based on the art I've created in the past 10 years. Have I stopped being an artist because I put down the brush and picked up a keyboard?

How would a child produce the exact same image if they don't have my AI model?

[-] khaleer@sopuli.xyz 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

You did not stop to be an artist, you just stopped to make art and every kid is able to recreate what you did, because all it have to do is type your name in prompts.

More than that, every kid drawing with a crayons on papers or on tablet is more creative than you this time.

[-] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago

How would a child produce the exact same image if they don’t have my AI model?

[-] Soup@lemmy.cafe 2 points 3 months ago

Congratulations! You’re now a poet for having typed that sentence!

[-] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago
[-] Soup@lemmy.cafe 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Are you okay?

If I run this through AI, do I get to be an “artist” like you?

[-] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The moment your art was run through AI, it was no longer yours, and no longer art.

I’m done talking about this. I stated my point, my opinion, and I have no intention to change it. AI is garbage.

[-] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 9 points 3 months ago

If you want to be the old man yelling how the world is changing for the worse, go ahead. You are entitled to your conservative opinion.

[-] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

k. Thanks! I have been waiting for weeks for permission from an AI “artist” to be allowed to have an opinion on something.

You’ve helped me out a lot!

[-] EddoWagt@feddit.nl 9 points 3 months ago

That assumes you have a big enough data set to even make anything useful with just your art. And we know that that was not the case here

[-] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

That's not the case here and I think the artist in the article has no claim to that image. I'm against the general idea that using AI instantly disqualifies someone as an artist, which is what the other person believes.

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 months ago

A child cannot be given a camera and be tasked to produce the exact same quality photo of a professional photographer- and succeed.

Um. A macaque did. And every photo a child takes with a smartphone is considered to be sufficiently creative as to be a copyrightable work. It doesn't need to be "good" to be art.

"What is art" can be a difficult question. But "how difficult was it to create it" is not the answer.

[-] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

If a skillless child can reproduce it with no training but a command of their language of origin, it’s not art. You can give a child a camera but they’re not gong to be Ansel Adams. Yet you can give a child a computer and voilà! You have Stable Diffusion.

I’m not arguing this with you any further.

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago

If a skillless child can reproduce it with no training but a command of their language of origin, it’s not art.

The art is in the eye, not the device. People made the same or similar claims about photography. "It's just reproduction not creation!" "It's just operating a machine that does all the work!"

AI is a tool - the person is the creative.

You may not like the art - but that's not to say it's not art. Either way I think it's a creative work and worthy of at least the option to be considered art.

[-] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

In my eye, AI isn’t art and using AI doesn’t make one an artist. In fact I think it’s an insult to at and artists that talentless hacks are now claiming the title when it takes a lifetime to develop a craft to become an artist.

It’s shameful.

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago

In my eye Jackson Pollock is a no-talent hack who created meaningless crap that looks like somebody left a 2yr old unsupervised in the arts and crafts room at school. And I think it's an insult to other artists that his work is so heavily prized.

But we're talking about the quality of the work here aren't we? Not whether it is a work at all. You're effectively saying that you don't value the work because it was easy. Which is fine - that's your value call. But to deny that it's a creative work at all is an entirely different thing.

[-] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

And you’re allowed to think that with no argument from me. But do you see how many people have rushed to tell me how I’m wrong with their shit examples?

AI isn’t art. It never will be. Using AI doesn’t make someone an artist. This is what I think. And it’s going to have to be okay.

[-] theterrasque@infosec.pub 2 points 3 months ago

AI can be art. And you're like the people criticizing the first photographers saying what they did wasn't art. This is what I think.

And it’s going to have to be okay.

[-] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

No, it’s not going to be okay being accused of something that I’m not. Photography IS art. AI is NOT art. So I’m not at all like the people saying it wasn’t.

You’re free to disagree with me on what is or isn’t art, but don’t accuse me of being like anything until you know exactly what I’m actually like.

Cool?

[-] Soup@lemmy.cafe 1 points 3 months ago

Cool. You’re now a novelist because of That paragraph. Congratulations!

this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2024
426 points (100.0% liked)

News

23916 readers
2607 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS