349
submitted 2 months ago by Hubi@feddit.org to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] lnxtx@feddit.nl 14 points 2 months ago

Could we stop making the international tensions? Provoking each other?

[-] chaospatterns@lemmy.world 80 points 2 months ago

The alternative is to let certain countries de facto claim a region because others are too afraid to call them on their BS

[-] wurzelgummidge@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

You do realise that Taipei's territorial claims are exactly the same as those of Beijing. I know the western media never bother to mention it because it doesn't align with the approved narrative but Taiwan claims the very same nine dash line as China.

To this day, Taiwan remains firm in its claims to the South China Sea. They have been historically justified on the basis that, as there was no United Nations Convention of the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) in existence in 1947, it was legitimate for the ROC to claim the South China Sea territories and waters based on the historical connections of these with China. According to the Institute for National Defense and Security Research (INDSR), a Taiwanese think tank, there was no legal impediment to the claim in 1947 and, for a long period, there were no challenges to the ROC’s claims from other countries.[4] They were largely ignored – except by the People’s Republic of China (PRC), which concurred with them.

https://www.thechinastory.org/taiwans-south-china-sea/

[-] slaacaa@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Tank(ie) you for sharing your opinion!

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 months ago

I know the western media never bother to mention it because it doesn't align with the approved narrative

How to say "I'm not worth listening to" without saying it.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

NATO states only seem to hear the things that please them.

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago

No no no. It's not "the approved narrative".

You need to make it sound more sinister.

[-] nednobbins@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago

There's a bit more to it than that.

NATO is a strategic alliance lead by the US. NATO doesn't have any feelings and isn't pleased or displeased about anything. Instead it generally does whatever is the US believes is most strategically advantageous.

Those strategist are typically smart people who listen to all kinds of things. They're definitely careful about what they say though and won't go around promoting information they don't want suppressed.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

NATO doesn’t have any feelings and isn’t pleased or displeased about anything.

Organizations are composed of people, my friend. And people have feelings.

Those strategist are typically smart people who listen to all kinds of things.

I've heard the same said of Joe Rogan.

[-] nednobbins@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago

Yes and emergent behavior goes both ways. Organizations have many properties that the individuals they're made up of don't have and they lack many properties that individuals have. Organizations don't have feelings. Even in the rare cases when the feelings of the people in those organizations are homogeneous, the organizations almost never manifest those feelings without significant alterations.

Are you seriously comparing Joe Rogan with NATO strategists?

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Organizations don’t have feelings.

Organizations are composed of people, my friend. And people have feelings.

[-] Neon@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

you do realize that's only because the CPR would never accept a end to the civil war with the independence of Taiwan?

The only reason Taiwan hasn't abandoned their claims yet is because that would mean they say they're independent, and that would lead to a certain invasion attempt by the CPR

[-] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Dude, I love China and its people and have been there several times. I obviously don’t approve of everything but some of the funniest, most kindhearted people on Earth are in China. I’m not sure there’s a place on Earth I’d rather have a meal with some regular citizens.

But just follow The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Taipei can be wrong too. But those laws took like centuries of stupid wars and, ultimately, diplomacy, to establish. Even if you want to change them, it’ll require diplomacy and cooperation, not hosing down some Filipino fishermen.

load more comments (29 replies)
this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2024
349 points (100.0% liked)

World News

39023 readers
1953 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS