179
Gold Star father Khizr Khan endorses Harris for president
(www.nbcnews.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2024
179 points (100.0% liked)
politics
19097 readers
2859 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
^ check this guy’s history and decide whether he’s got an axe to grind, and maybe a Lada to earn.
trying to depress turnout while claiming voter suppression is not a big deal. chef's kiss.
Democrats are as allergic to factual information as the Republicans are
anything that shatters the Democrat fantasy must be some Russian paid troll thing tied to the Republicans
Republicans have a similar bitch with different wording but again meaning is the same
both parties support elections based on showmanship, hot air, and fluff without any progressive goals that would benefit the people
Did you miss the announcement like two days ago that a shit ton of right wing douchebags were "unwittingly" on Russia's payroll?
As unwitting as one can be. When they Google time in Moscow trying to figure out why someone supposedly in Paris isn't responding.
Though to be fair it isn't just the right wing. There are those on the left as well. And I'm sure ole verdant checks some of them daily to get their information. I think the only difference is that no one is going to pay any of the ones on the left tens of thousand to hundreds of thousands per podcast episode to push out misinformation. Probably just a few nickel-plated commemorative Stalin pins.
You say all that and manage to miss that R doesnt just not have progressive goals, it has regressive goals. This is you right now: "hey everyone, Democats are as bad (or.maybe worse cause we dont know everything they are lying about) as the republicans. You shouldn't participate in national politics." Literally everyone knows Harris and waltz are liars. You're not bringing anything helpful to the table here, and it just makes you sound.. Well... Stupid. Sometimes the "w" is just "fine let's at least try to get abortion rights in the constitution" ormaybe "yay the people that PUBLISHED their plan to destroy the constitution and prop up project 2025 didn't get voted in!"
Im not who you're responding to but if the Rs are "regressive" and the Dems are not "progressive" but instead "status quo" couldn't my opinion,
(CW: chinese bot alert! BoTh SiDeS vote suppression incoming!)
"neither party will help us move left" be pretty spot on? That is what everyone on the left wants, yeah? For the Overton Window to move left? We agree? Please tell me we agree on this much.
If we do, how is such leftward movement even possible in the current political climate, with the DNC so hostile to the leftists already in its tent and openly courting 'left-leaning' Republicans? They are currently campaigning with right-wing rhetoric like a "lethal fighting force" and a "strong border wall". Is the way to fight conservatism getting conservatives to join you? I guess I'm too stupid to see how that could work.
I'm not saying Harris needs to make Roe v Wade's return the number one cause of her campaign, but it and other leftist causes should be talked about waaay more than they have, don't you think? I do anyway.
Assuming i still have your ear and we agree the DNC is moving right politically, what can a Democratic voter do to slow or stop this rightward trend?
Here's where you expect me to tell you to vote 3rd party or some other useless shit but naw, the answer is "i dont know and it's driving me bonkers thinking about how it must. "
To be abundantly clear, please do vote for Harris. I am absolutely serious. I want her to win.
Honestly, my secret fantasy has the Democrats winning a supermajority in all parts of the country and, without the republican bugaboo to point at and blame are either forced to come through on some long-term platform promises to leftists, or the voters are finally forced to see the Democratic Party for who they really are and finally form a party that represents them because it is them.
Or the Dems prove me full of shit and it really was the darn ol' Rs all along! What a blow to my ego that would be hahaha! I'd still take that L happily tho.
First go check VB's post history. Some of the criticism is well deserved.
Second, depending on the framing and audience, Democrats absolutely are the left. If you are in heavily socialist places that claim will rightfully get you laughed at. Since we defined it as capitalist vs not. And any type of liberal is staunchly unwaveringly capitalist to a fault. But outside that you're just talking past people to score points.
Are Democrats progressive? Absolutely. Like a snail is speedy. But snails still get around. It isn't satisfactory to myself or a lot of others. But it's nothing to disregard. They'll eventually get to the right answer after they've tried every other option. But they CAN get there unlike Republicans. And we CAN speed it up with cooperation and solidarity where it makes sense.
No Democrats aren't moving right. If you define right as capitalist there's nothing right of economic-liberalism/liberals or neoliberals/neoconservatives. Are they wavering somewhat rudderless on social issues trying to check what direction political winds might be blowing to find support? Absolutely. But they still, after far too long, did eventually bring about equal marriage rights for gay couples. And while it's far from perfect they do provide understanding and support in general to trans groups. They absolutely need to do more and to do better. But they can be worked with and reasoned with. Perhaps just not trusted.