8

Initially I didn't like Fedora Flatpaks, but they have grown on me. What I really like about them is how they are built directly from Fedora RPMs.

Unlike Flathub, they don't pull and build dependencies directly off the internet (which may not get timely updates). Instead those dependencies come from Fedora's repos.

The way Fedora Flatpaks get built are also much more consistent since they just use Fedora's infrastructure. Meanwhile flatpaks on Flathub may be repackaged Appimages, snaps, tar.gzs, built from source, etc.

Though there is the obvious downside of Fedora Flatpaks which is missing media codecs. So if an app needs codecs, I just end up using Flathub versions. And Flathub for whatever isn't in the Fedora Flatpaks repo.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago

Biggest pro: they use a single runtime!

The flatpak runtime system is a total mess... 3 variants, 3 supported versions, this is crazy!

I will setup an 8GB Chromebook soon, and Flatpaks will be challenging.

[-] that_leaflet@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

There is a second runtime for KDE stuff.

[-] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago

Ok good to know. Still possibly smaller and just an extension, not a whole duplicated runtime

this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2024
8 points (100.0% liked)

Fedora Linux

1663 readers
1 users here now

All about Fedora Linux

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS